Đăng ký

Danh sách trả lời của Phạm Văn Bắc

Tìm thấy 32.540 kết quả

Thời gian Nội dung Điểm thực lực Điểm cảm ơn
13/01/2025 19:52:26 <p>Sample 1:</p><p>The given bar chart illustrates the number of applicants from four different countries who applied to a European university between 2004 and 2008.</p><p>Overall, the chart clearly indicates that China’s dominance as the largest applicant pool for the European university declined over the five-year period and was eventually overtaken by the United States. Despite an increase, the number of students from Japan and Russia were significantly lower than the other two.</p><p>In 2004, China had the highest number of applicants, with nearly 30,000 students applying to the European university. However, this number decreased steadily over the next five years, reaching just 18,000 by 2008. In contrast, the United States, which ranked second in 2004, saw a consistent increase and surpassed China in 2007, rising to almost 30,000 by the end.</p><p>Japan and Russia also experienced an increase in the number of applicants, but the figures were much lower compared to the aforementioned countries. Specifically, the figure for Japan nearly doubled, rising to approximately 15,000, while that from Russia tripled, reaching about 7,000 in 2008.</p>
13/01/2025 19:49:51 <p>Sample 1:</p><p>The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country, namely timber, pulp, and paper, from 1980 to 2000.</p><p>Overall, while all three categories fluctuated wildly throughout the period, they ultimately increased substantially.</p><p>In 1980, even though pulp had the highest production initially (roughly 5.5 million tons), it plummeted to just over 2 million tons and was immediately overtaken by timber in the following years. From 1982 to 1985, both timber and pulp had similar increasing trends, rising sharply from 6.5 to 10 and 2.2 to 6.5 million tons, respectively. From 1985 to 1990, pulp’s figure kept growing at a slower rate while timber dipped to 8.0 million tons in 1987 and remained there till 1990. Paper consistently grew from 4.0 to 6.5 million tons during this time frame.</p><p>For the remaining period, timber declined to around 6.2 million tons before bouncing back to 8.0 in 1997 and slightly decreased to 7.8 in 2000, ultimately finishing last. In contrast, despite a slight dip in 1997, the paper almost doubled its 1990 figure and reached first place in 2000. In the same period, pulp gradually rose from 8.0 to approximately 10.0 million tons.</p><p>Sample 2:</p><p>The line chart demonstrates the production trends of three forest industry products - timber, pulp and paper - in a European country over a 20-year period, from 1980 to 2000. </p><p>Overall, it can be observed that all three categories had fluctuated throughout the period. Pulp and paper, in particular, experienced an upward trend, while timber saw a downward trend.</p><p>In terms of pulp and paper production, pulp was marginally higher than paper in 1980, with nearly 6 million tonnes and 4 million tonnes, respectively. Following a sharp decline, pulp production began to recover in 1985, climbing from 7 million tonnes to 10 million tonnes by the end of the period. Similarly, paper production rose steadily until a slight fallback in 1995, and then increased rapidly, peaking at 12 million tonnes in 2000.</p><p>Regarding timber, the production started at 5 million tonnes in 1980 and rose sharply to 10 million tonnes in 1985. However, over the following 15 years, the production figure saw a gradual decrease and eventually reached nearly 8 million tonnes at the end of the period.</p><p>Sample 3:</p><p>The given graph depicts the production of wood pulp, timber, and paper in a European country between 1980 and 2000. Overall, the growth in paper production was substantial and steady throughout the period, while the quantity of wood pulp increased moderately with some disruptions. Timber, on the other hand, was the only product to have such irregularities and experienced significant fluctuations.</p><p>In 1980, paper production began at 4 million tonnes, which climbed steadily to 9 million tonnes before experiencing a slight dip to 8 million tonnes in 1997-98. The quantity then recovered and reached its peak at 12 million tonnes in 2000.</p><p>Wood pulp started with the highest production of the three commodities, with 6 million tonnes, but dropped to about 3.6 million tonnes by 1983. It immediately rose again and tripled the previous level in 1985. However, there was not much growth in the following period, and the production remained between 7-10 million tonnes.</p><p>Between 1980 and 1985, the production of timber increased dramatically, from 5 million tonnes to 10 million tonnes, before declining to just over 6 million tonnes until 1995. Production grew once again to 8 million tonnes in the final five years of the era before rapidly falling off once more.</p><p>Sample 4:</p><p>The provided graph illustrates the production trends of timber, pulp, and paper in a European country from 1980 to 2000.</p><p>Throughout the entire period, all three categories experienced notable fluctuations, yet collectively demonstrated substantial overall growth.</p><p>The initial production of pulp slightly surpassed that of paper in 1980, with approximately 6 million tonnes for pulp and 4 million tonnes for paper. Subsequently, pulp experienced a significant decline to under 2 million tonnes in 1982 before a recovery to about 7 million tonnes in 1985 and then a substantial 10 million tonnes by the conclusion of the period. Conversely, paper production displayed a consistent increase from 4 to a high of approximately 9 million tonnes in 1995, momentarily slowing in 1995, before surging rapidly and reaching its pinnacle at 12 million tonnes by 2000.</p><p>In contrast, timber production commenced at 5 million tonnes in 1980, swiftly escalating to 10 million tonnes by 1985. However, over the ensuing 10 years, timber production exhibited a gradual decline to hit a low of about 6 million tonnes in 1995. Then, this figure rebounded before dropping again to under 8 million tonnes by 2000, concluding in the lowest position.</p>
13/01/2025 19:45:11 <p>Hướng dẫn giải</p><p>Đổi 30 cm = 3 dm.</p><p>Thể tích của hình lập phương là dm<sup>3</sup>.</p><p>Thể tích của khối chóp là dm<sup>3</sup>.</p><p>Thể tích phần không gian bên trong chiếc hộp không bị chiếm bởi mô hình đồ chơi dạng hình chóp là dm<sup>3</sup>.</p>
13/01/2025 19:47:48 <p>Hướng dẫn giải</p><p>Trả lời: 0,84</p><p>Ta có , là trung điểm của . Suy ra .</p><p>Hạ .</p><p>Vì và nên mà nên .</p><p>Do đó .</p><p>Ta có .</p><p>Vì có diện tích .</p><p>Ta có .</p>
13/01/2025 19:53:10 <p>Hướng dẫn giải</p><p>a) S, b) Đ, c) Đ, d) S</p><p>a) Nếu thì .</p><p>b) .</p><p>c) Nếu thì .</p><p>d) .</p>
13/01/2025 19:50:52 <p>Hướng dẫn giải</p><p>Trả lời: 9</p><p>Điều kiện: .</p><p>(thỏa mãn).</p><p>Vậy nghiệm của phương trình là .</p>
13/01/2025 19:51:13 <p>Hướng dẫn giải</p><p>Trả lời: 60</p><p>Vì \(BC//AD\) nên \(\left( {SA,BC} \right) = \left( {SA,AD} \right) = \widehat {SAD} = 60^\circ \) (do \(\Delta SAD\) đều).</p>
13/01/2025 19:48:37 Hướng dẫn giải Trả lời: 0,82 Gọi \(A\) ...
13/01/2025 19:46:21 Nội dung A Nội dung B Nội dung C ...
13/01/2025 19:48:08 a. Nó đang khỏi ốm từ tuần trước. sửa ...
Trang chủ Giải đáp bài tập Đố vui Ca dao tục ngữ Đề thi, kiểm tra
Tải ứng dụng Lazi
Giới thiệu Hỏi đáp tổng hợp Đuổi hình bắt chữ Thi trắc nghiệm Ý tưởng phát triển Lazi
Liên hệ Trắc nghiệm tri thức Điều ước và lời chúc Kết bạn 4 phương Xem lịch
Điều khoản sử dụng Khảo sát ý kiến Xem ảnh Hội nhóm Bảng xếp hạng
Chính sách bảo mật Flashcard Thơ văn danh ngôn Mua ô tô Bảng Huy hiệu
Xem thêm
Đơn vị chủ quản: Công ty CP Công nghệ Lazi
Mã số doanh nghiệp: 0108765276
Địa chỉ: Trần Quốc Hoàn, Cầu Giấy, Hà Nội
Email: [email protected] - ĐT: 0387 360 610
Chịu trách nhiệm nội dung: Phạm Văn Cao
© Copyright 2015 - 2026 Lazi. All rights reserved.