Sample 1:

Some people think that reading for pleasure increases people’s imagination and language skills more so than watching TV does. Personally, I totally agree with this view and will analyse the reasons in the following essay.

Reading for enjoyment can help people to develop their imagination and improve their language skills in many ways. Firstly, while watching television is said to be more of a passive activity, reading is considered to be an active form of learning. Reading stimulates people’s brains more as they have to use their imagination to visualise the characters and plot of the story, and this helps to further develop their imaginative thinking skills. Secondly, language skills can also be improved from reading. By reading regularly, people can expand their vocabulary and learn different grammatical structures and how to use them effectively.

Watching TV, on the other hand, does little to enhance people’s imagination and language skills. While reading, people have plenty of time to read the text and visualise the content of the story. However, when watching TV, viewers use their imagination very little, as they can see the images on the screen. Furthermore, the dialogue of the story or movie is usually spoken at a fast pace, which does not give viewers much time to comprehend what is being said, let alone learning anything new. Finally, television is full of advertisements these days and therefore distracts viewers from what they are watching. This makes it even more difficult for people to absorb information that might enhance their language skills.

In conclusion, I believe that reading books is a more efficient way for people to enhance their imagination and language skills, while watching TV is simply more of a source of entertainment.

Sample 2:

Many people today contend that reading would be better than watching TV in developing one’s imagination and language skills. I personally do not believe that any one format is inherently better at improving these creative capabilities, for it ultimately depends on the type of content and the mental age of the viewer that consumes the media.

I argue that TV, through its ability to illustrate realistic or colourful depictions of life through an entertaining manner, can be beneficial for children in improving their mental capabilities. Those who are of early age might not be able to read, and as such, might pick up their spoken vocabulary from TV instead. Children’s shows on channels such as Nickelodeon are hugely popular for this reason, as parents allow their kids to tune in to not only be entertained but to improve their skills at the same time.

Nonetheless, it is true that some forms of creative and linguistic expression are conveyed better in writings than on TV. These are things such as character backgrounds or subtle details that can be obsessively explored in books. It would be more difficult for audio-visual mediums such as films to convey the same features in similar lengths. This is why many people often complain that movie adaptations often do not live up to the standards of the book, for the latter is able to delve into the nitty-gritty of the storyline better than a movie more often than not. Books could therefore be better for imagination and development past a certain age.

Overall, I argue that both mediums have their own sets of advantages and disadvantages, and it is dependent upon the maker of either books or TV shows to develop intellectually engaging material.

Sample 3:

Some people subscribe to the belief that reading helps enhance language skills and creativity, whereas watching television does very little for these abilities. Personally, I support this opinion for several reasons, which will be laid out in this essay.

As we all know, books use text to convey ideas and quite often there are no images or illustrations to picture the scenes described in the book; therefore, we have to use our own imagination while reading. For example, reading a fantasy novel that contains mythical creatures one would normally see the appearance of those characters in their mind while following the plot. In contrast, movie heroes on a TV screen are usually created for the viewer by directors and producers of the film. Watching TV substitutes the need to develop one's own imagination because the characters and their surroundings are shown on the screen.

Furthermore, it is argued that reading is the best way to expand one's vocabulary. The reader learns the correct spelling of a word by seeing it printed in a book, and they grasp its meaning from the context, without having to look it up in a dictionary. Not only new words but also numerous sentence structures can be learnt from books. To take advantage of these benefits English teachers in many schools use English novels as teaching materials. Students are asked to read the story and capture the keywords to answer the questions in the exam. In comparison, learning new words while watching a TV show isn't always easy because the viewer's attention is drawn to the action on the screen and if there are no subtitles, the spelling of the words is not obvious. All this makes a book a more effective tool for a language learner compared to TV.

In conclusion, I believe people who love to read tend to have a more active imagination and advanced linguistic comprehension than those who watch television, since readers are required to imagine the story in the book and learn the meaning of new words from the context.

Sample 4:

Although it is believed that pleasure reading is a better way to improve imagination and linguistic skills, I think that learning through watching TV is as effective as reading.

Of course, reading for pleasure brings benefits to the readers. When reading, the readers have to use their creativeness to comprehend the concept and the context delivered in the book. For example, children reading fiction may need to visualise the event written in the book, therefore improving their imaginative thinking. Also, reading can enhance the language, especially in reading and writing. As a language teacher, I have seen students reading a text in their native or foreign languages and have questions about the vocabulary, sentence structure or grammar use. This has helped them better understand of grammatical and lexical usage.

Many people think that TV is not a good choice to enhance imagination and language ability because they might focus too much on commercial and entertaining programmes. However, they should realise the fact that other channels such as tourism or news inform audience and help them imagine the world around. Otherwise, those who want to improve their thinking and imaginative skills can watch many educational programmes as quiz shows. I think the matter is only watching appropriate programs. In terms of language skills, people can improve their listening and speaking skills as they can listen to the sound of the word and the use in spoken context with vivid images to illustrate the exact meaning.

In conclusion, reading is often recommended to improve language capabilities and imagination power for an individual, but the role of TV in the individual’s development of verbal abilities and imaginative thinking should not be underrated.

Sample 5:

It is believed that pleasure reading is a better way to improve imagination and linguistic skills than watching TV. I agree with this idea for some reasons.

Of course, reading for pleasure brings benefits to the readers. As a language teacher, I have seen students read a text in both their native and foreign languages and have questions about the vocabulary, sentence structure or grammar use. This has helped them better understand of grammatical and lexical usage, especially in reading and writing. Also, when reading, the readers have to use their creativeness to comprehend the concept and the context delivered in the book. For example, children reading fiction may need to visualise the event, therefore improving their imaginative thinking.

Similarly, watching TV can enhance imagination and language ability. Viewers can improve their listening and speaking skills as they can listen to the sound of the word and how it is used in spoken context with vivid images to illustrate the exact meaning. In terms of imagination, many channels such as tourism or news inform viewers and help them imagine the world around. Otherwise, those who want to improve their thinking and imaginative skills can watch many educational programmes as quiz shows.

However, the reason why TV is not a good choice for learning such skills lies on the fact that it is more difficult to keep our attention on learning when watching TV than reading. Televisions focus on increasing ratings for the higher profit from advertising so that they often catch viewers’ attention on commercial or entertaining channels rather than educational ones.

In conclusion, although watching TV can improve language capabilities and imagination power for an individual, I think that reading is better and more effective than watching TV.

Sample 6:

Some people believe that reading books for pleasure is far better for enhancing people's creativity, imagination and linguistic abilities than watching TV. I completely agree that the ingenious capability and language skills of a person are better nurtured by reading books than by watching television programmes in their free time.

To commence with, reading for pleasure captures the attention of a person more than watching TV can. Reading opens doors to an imaginative world giving individuals the opportunity to engage their creative and critical thinking. But watching television is mostly a passive activity, and people get easily distracted by entertaining and sensational programmes than educational programmes on TV. A recent report published by Coventry University London reveals that an average TV watcher switches TV channels at least 10 times an hour and often ends up spending as high as thrice more time than initially intended. This emphasizes how watching TV can offer little value to viewers' creative development on the one hand and kills valuable time on the other hand.

Moreover, readers pay apt attention to sentence structures, writing styles and vocabulary when reading a book. They even open a dictionary to learn about a word when confronted with a new one. This gives them an excellent opportunity to enhance their linguistic skills. On the other hand, while watching TV, they do not pay much attention to sentence structures or individual words as entertainment is their main purpose. To give an example, research work indicates that people who are avid readers tend to become better users of the language than those who are not. This demonstrates the effectiveness of reading books in developing language skills.

To conclude, from the discussion and analysis of the effects of reading books and watching TV, we can express that reading as a hobby has a profoundly positive impact on developing individuals' creative and imagination power and language skills while TV offers little value for that. 

Sample 7:

Some people believe that reading for pleasure is more useful than watching television since reading habit improves people's creativity and imagination, and language skills more than watching TV can. To a certain extent, I would agree with the statement, but I do believe that watching educative television programmes could also bring positive outcomes.

Reading enhances the creativity of people who enjoy it. Every book opens up a new window to the mind of the reader. It makes them wonder, walks into a realm they never thought would exist and put them in the centre of an impossible situation when they have to critically think about the characters and their situations presented by the writer. This engages their brain and imagination power which research shows is conducive to positively developing imagination. Besides that, regular readers get used to seeing proper grammar, formal language and new collocations every now and then, and their brains pick many of these giving them the ability to use them by themselves. It gradually improves their skill in handling the complex aspects of a language.

But watching educational television programmes for a prescribed duration of time can also bring benefits to the audiences. Some television channels trigger their viewer's imaginative and creative thinking, such as National Geographic or Discovery Channel while many TV documentaries are highly prised for their ability to engage viewers making them wonder about what they see and hear. News channels like BBC and CNN are often recommended by language teachers as those news channels are proven to improve listening and communication skills.

In conclusion, it is expressed by many people that reading has more positive effects on developing people's creative thinking and language skills. To a certain point, I would agree with it, but I also believe that watching appropriate and educative television programmes can also improve our imaginative thinking and communication skills.

Sample 8:

Some opine that individuals who engage in reading are more likely to cultivate enhanced creative abilities and linguistic competence compared to those who prefer television as their primary source of entertainment. I agree with this view and in this essay, I shall explain why I possess this opinion.

One primary reason why reading for pleasure fosters imagination and language skills is the immersive nature of books. When individuals delve into the imaginative worlds crafted by authors, they are compelled to visualize and conceptualize scenarios, characters, and settings. Unlike passive television consumption, reading stimulates active mental engagement, encouraging readers to construct their interpretations of the storylines. For example, when a child reads a fantasy novel describing magical realms and mystical creatures, they are encouraged to visualize and create these elements in their minds. This imaginative exercise contributes to the development of creative thinking and problem-solving skills, as readers are exposed to unique perspectives and ideas.

Another factor that bolsters the case for reading's impact on language skills is exposure to varied vocabulary and literary styles. Books, especially those from different genres and historical periods, offer an extensive range of language usage and writing techniques. Through extensive reading, individuals encounter diverse sentence structures, word choices, and narrative formats, expanding their linguistic repertoire. For instance, an avid reader may effortlessly identify subtle linguistic nuances and employ sophisticated expressions in both writing and conversation.

In conclusion, the evidence suggests that reading for pleasure indeed plays a pivotal role in cultivating imagination and language skills. Hence, it is reasonable to agree that people who choose books over television are more likely to develop richer imagination and language skills, unlocking a myriad of intellectual and personal benefits along the way.

Sample 9:

There is a widespread saying that books and novels spur the imagination and language skills much more than any TV programme. I believe that this notion holds true no matter what modern technologies are used on TV and TV media production. The reasons are simple, because reading is an active form of learning while watching TV is mostly passive.

Reading for pleasure, as an active method of knowledge acquisition, allows people to create and memorize concepts more clearly. Firstly, the text format pushes readers to purposefully, in their minds, convert words into unique images and sentences into motion pictures. For example, the Harry Potter series of novels have allowed fans to create and construct their representation of the wizard world that is filled with magic and spells. Many readers continue to dream up myriads of spin-off stories based on the characters after the final book. Secondly, the process of reading also allows people to learn better by letting people control their own pace of studying. One can pause at any moment to reread, review, absorb new information, and avoid getting overwhelmed. This ability to stop and ponder is particularly helpful when trying to familiarize oneself with a new language. Many studies have shown a strong linkage between time spent reading and vocabulary improvements.

Watching TV, on the other hand, does not have any of the aforementioned merits. Viewers can only watch the visualization that is given and predefined by TV programmes. Since no extra effort in thinking is needed, people who watch a lot of TV will most likely be lazy to conceptualize any originality in imagination. For example, if children grow up only watching the Lords of the Rings movies and not knowing the books, they will only have one way, and the same way, of describing a dwarf, an elf or a hobbit. Moreover, the languages used on TV are also mostly informal and straightforward, in tune with the needs to deliver information quickly. Therefore, while the listening skill is likely to improve after prolonged exposure to the TV, not much else can be developed, linguistically.

In conclusion, reading books is by far superior to watching TV in terms of creativity and language development because reading gives people total control of their minds. In a world flooded with information, the ability to control your thoughts is the key to improve oneself.

Sample 10:

It is true that reading brings many benefits to readers. Some people argue that books and magazines offer more advantages in developing linguistic and imaginative skills than TV programmes do, and I agree with this opinion because of the following reasons.

Firstly, language on TV programmes is generally less formal in comparison with that used in written materials. For example, TV shows often involve using spoken language, which people use in daily conversations to convey their thoughts. In contrast, words and phrases written in books and magazines are more literate and formal, showing not only the meanings but also the attitudes of the writers towards some certain situations. As such, people who like reading may find it useful to learn how to use language effectively to express their mind.

Secondly, watching differs greatly from reading in terms of developing imagination. To illustrate further, although TV offers beautiful movies with special effects, the images are passively absorbed by viewers. Therefore, gradually people who watch TV all day long will lose the tendency to imagine and think actively. Unlike watchers, readers build their world of imagination through words and phrases written in the books, and this enables them to spark ideas even in nearly every situation in daily life.This is the reason why many parents these days allow their children to watch TV no more than couples of hours a day and spur them to read books in order that the children can grow up mentally.

In conclusion, I firmly hold the view that by reading, people can gain many benefits sharpening imagination and language skills. It is thus recommended that we spend more time on reading books for pleasure than watching TV in leisure time.

Sample 11:

Some people believe reading books in leisure time helps develop creativity and improve language skills. However, this belief is opposed by others, as they support the idea that watching television is more useful. Even though both have their benefits, I believe reading books is more profitable. The following paragraphs in this essay will further clarify my view.

To begin with, reading for pleasure opens the door to limitless worlds of imagination. When we read a book, we are not just passive observers; we become active participants in creating a mental image. For instance, readers worldwide have been charmed by the thrilling adventures of the characters and became a part of the magical realm of the Harry Potter series created by J.K. Rowling. Therefore, the power of imagination produced through reading allows individuals to imagine and explore the fantastic world beyond the limitations of reality.

Moreover, reading for pleasure is a powerful tool for language development. When we read a well-written novel or a thought-provoking poem by famous authors like Jane Austen or William Shakespeare, we discover a wide variety of vocabulary and language structures. Their mastery of language reflected in novels such as ‘Pride and Prejudice’ and plays like ‘Hamlet’, not only provides knowledge but also serves as a treasure for readers aiming to refine their language skills. On the other hand, television often fails to offer the same level of engagement and mental push as books. For example, watching a detective series may provide a suspenseful story, but it does not need viewers to picture the scenes or characters like reading a mystery novel does.

In conclusion, the benefits of reading for pleasure, including the development of imagination and language skills, are unquestionable. Hence, I support that even though television has its place in entertainment and education, reading books plays a decisive role in developing creativity and language abilities.

Sample 12:

In the age of technology, where television and digital screens dominate our leisure time, the debate over the benefits of reading for pleasure versus watching TV has gained significant attention. While both activities have their merits, I firmly believe that reading for pleasure not only stimulates the imagination but also enhances language skills in a way that television cannot.

On one hand, the hypnotic quality of reading for pleasure is remarkable in its ability to power the imagination. When we dive into a good book, like Roald Dahl’s ‘Charlie and the Chocolate Factory’, we are transported into a world of pure imagination. The vivid descriptions of Willy Wonka’s chocolate factory and the impulsive characters spark our creative capabilities, enabling us to fantasize about the unbelievable settings and characters in our minds.

Most importantly, the language used in well-crafted literature enriches language aptitudes. For example, the playful rhymes and inventive language in the timeless tales of Dr. Seuss’s ‘Green Eggs and Ham’ not only intrigue young readers but also introduce them to the richness and flexibility of language. As a result, reading exposes us to a diverse range of vocabulary and sentence structures, laying the foundation for strong language skills. On the other hand, television, with gripping TV shows, does not require the same mental effort as reading. For instance, while J.K. Rowling’s ‘Harry Potter’ book series provides a more detailed and imaginative experience, allowing readers to delve deeper into the magical world of Hogwarts, watching the film adaptation misses out on the ingenious elements.

To sum up, I would like to point out that while both reading for pleasure and watching TV have their worth, the unique ability of books to stimulate imagination and enhance language skills is unparalleled.

Sample 13:

Opinions are divided on whether people who engage in extensive reading exhibit a more developed imagination than those who watch television regularly. Although TV viewing can indeed be beneficial in some respects, I believe reading books promotes cognitive development in a more significant way.

Granted, watching TV shows and programs may stimulate viewers’ imaginations. By incorporating a variety of elements such as special effects, animations, and audio, television can spark viewers' imaginations and encourage them to picture similar settings or scenarios in their minds. However, the audience’s visualizations are often limited to what is depicted on screen, which can lead viewers to think in ways that align with the producers’ visions, rather than forming their own independent thoughts. Beyond that, the imaginative experience offered by television can be fleeting because TV shows have fixed start and end times. This limitation disrupts the creative process among viewers, which cannot be easily resumed until the next episode airs.

On the other hand, enjoying books can more effectively foster a vivid imagination through both the mental processes involved and by having a broader range of topics. The act of reading demands more mental exertion than watching TV, as readers must visualize and transform written texts into their personal interpretations. This process fosters creative thinking as there are few limitations to what people can imagine, a benefit enhanced by the absence of advertising breaks or fixed showtimes found in TV, allowing readers to take time to reflect and enjoy books at their own pace. Additionally, books offer a wider range of content thanks to their cost-effective production. Unlike TV show producers, who are constrained by budgets, authors have the freedom to depict any subject of interest in great detail, thanks to their use of descriptive language. This offers readers diverse opportunities to imagine virtually anything, from fantasy adventures to sophisticated scientific concepts.

In conclusion, while televised content has a number of limitations, written texts provide more significant cognitive stimulation. Based on the aforementioned arguments, I contend that those who read for enjoyment tend to have a more comprehensive imagination compared to TV viewers.Sample 14:

It is commonly believed by many that the joy of reading opens up imaginative skills and elite linguistic development compared to those who watch television. I believe reading is an art and it comes with many positive sides if individuals read a lot. Firstly, this essay shall discuss how possessive habit of reading helps us to enhance our language skills and secondly it will argue that how digital television ruins the positive impact of reading.

Reading is an art for many because few try to learn new languages, many enhance their knowledge, and some earn creativity. Globally people read for improving skills and development, in the early days’ people were restricted to very few languages like local spoken and globally spoken but these days individuals spend money to pursue multi-linguistic skills. For example, people in India speak more than three languages daily for their communication. Moreover, reading can establish a link between knowledge and imagination if a person is a keen reader. For example, the founder of Microsoft, Mr. Bill Gates once said that reading is the way to find creativity and fruitful outcomes in life.

Currently, digital gadgets are more arduous for individuals due to their technical scripts though many young people find an easy way to develop skills through this digital equipment such as television, computer, and cellular devices it distracts enormously from product knowledge. Television is also part of entertainment where one can sit on the couch and relieve the stress of the day, where the positive influence of reading books or newspapers undermines.

To conclude, it’s better to keep a balance between both activities while pursuing something as both come with their own merits. Fortunately, reading has upper hands in our life as it produces more than anything else.

Sample 15:

Compared to watching television, reading fiction has long been believed to enhance people's imagination and improve their language skills. While the former aspect of this argument is clearly correct, the latter is more nuanced than it appears.

The positive effects of reading fictional works on people’s ability to imagine are crystal-clear. While watching TV is associated with enjoying programs visually, with all lively images available in front of the viewer’s eyes, reading novels or short stories page by page, normally without pictures, requires and encourages the brain to think of possible actions or scenes potentially accompanying the words read.

This happens naturally and has, for thousands of years, been proved to have a beneficial impact on the reader’s cognitive development, including imagination. Language skills are not that simple. For reading and writing, it goes without saying that reading for pleasure benefits people more, merely because these two skills are closely related to the printed word.

However, for listening and speaking, light has been shed on the importance of exposure to the spoken language rather than the written language. Therefore, those who spend their leisure time watching TV in general, and films on TV in particular, tend to be capable of improving their skills of listening and speaking much faster or much more efficiently.

All in all, I find it difficult to fully agree with the view at issue. Simply put, the more time spent reading fiction, the sharper one’s imagination, reading, and writing skills become. However, improving listening and speaking proficiency requires exposure to a variety of television programs.