The English language is an international language which dominates almost all relationships between countries. Therefore important people need to speak the English language fluently. In addition, simple people should know English. Firstly it is good to be able to speak another language as well as your mother tongue. And also when you visit an English-speaking country, you will need to know English. Learning English while living in a country like UK, USA, Australia, Canada etc. is a very good option but in my opinion, there are other effective ways to learn it as well.

I think studying the English language is now more different than studying other languages. In these days English is educated in most countries across the world. Furthermore, every person, who has the internet accessibility at their house, has a great alternative to acquiring knowledge of speaking English. The internet provides a great deal of opportunity to study English on the chair you sit. Moreover today the English lessons are taught on the internet as efficient as they are taught in the class.
But of course, the best and the most efficient way of studying the English language is still to live and spend most of your time in an English-speaking environment. By this way, you are induced to speak and study English with its actual speakers. If there is a chance to study English in an English-speaking country, it is the best scope that a person can ever have.

However, in my opinion, it is not the only opportunity to study English. Because there are good enough programs that are applied by well-educated teachers all around the world. All you need is the perseverance that induces to hardworking. Thereby you can study whatever you want wherever you are by trying hard

Foreign languages are one of the necessary elements to integrate into the world. However, in my considered opinion, schools should not force their students who do not have the ability to study new languages.

In the first place, if students have to study things they do not like, it will result in them not liking it still. Children who learn under pressure will not do well in the examination. Their results are probably affected as a consequence. It leads students to lose their passion, aspiration not to mention motivation in studying. Another reason is that students would have more chance to focus on primary subjects.

May children who do not have new-language-ability may have some special aptitudes such as high numeracy in math, physics and biology or literacy in literature and so on. Therefore, they should spend more time on studying their favorite subject in school or developing their creativity.

Some opponents reckon that if schools force them to study new language, they can still learn it. There is much evidence which shows the results of changing the way to teach language by creating special education classes or using more pictures and interactive activities.

Despite the fact that the point of view may be true, the cost of opening these special education classes is much higher than normal ones. Therefore, in order to do that, schools need to obtain sufficient funds. It seems to be impossible while the global economy is suffering from the effects of recession.

In summary, although both suggestions are provided with the aim of supporting children's development, no-force could be better than the other in this situation. It is not necessary to force children to do what they are not good at.