It is true that some commentators argue that providing citizens with a better educational system is more effective to treat criminals rather than imprisonment, which is the prevalent conducted punishment in most countries.
Nevertheless
, I disagree with
this
point of view as I believe these two approaches have their own distinctive advantages and should each play an integral role in tackling
crime
. On the one hand, prison is an ideal way of dealing with offenders.
Firstly
, those who commit
crime
should learn that
unlawful actions
provoke negative consequences. To illustrate, serving a prison sentence for several
years probably
acts as a deterrent. Criminals know they would confront the loss of freedom, social isolation or separation with their beloved ones.
Secondly
, it is undeniable that when offenders are in jail, they
can not
be a danger to society, which enables
civils
to walk on streets or relax at home more safely.
On the other hand
, I consider the education owns a complementary role to play. In schools, students should study some laws which affect their lives. Being armed with the understanding of the law, school pupils are likely to become law-abiding citizens and avoid situations which may involve them in being victims.
For instance
, youngsters should study
such
important laws as driving and road safety.
Moreover
, educational programs for prisoners should aim to provide prisoners with skills and qualifications to find jobs after they are released. In conclusion, I believe that custodial sentences are
such
an essential weapon in the fight against
crime
, yet I disagree that providing better education alone is a more effective solution to reduce the
crime
rate.