Sample 1:

It is believed that oral communication is more effective than written communication. In my opinion, deciding which one is more powerful than the other depends on certain circumstances.

When it comes to situations that require body language and facial expressions, spoken words are better than written ones. Dating is an excellent example of this. It is more important to set up a face-to-face conversation with the person we have feelings for than to sit at home and send text messages. Emotion icons, photos or videos can never replace a real smile or the expression of different feelings during a dinner date. Another thing is that meeting and talking directly with each other helps us to have a better understanding of the person we are communicating with. We can easily guess the true feelings of the person we are talking face to face with through his or her facial expressions and gestures, but we cannot do that just by reading some written text.

However, I think that in terms of law and business, written communication is much more important than spoken words. In court, for example, our words might count for nothing if we do not have valid evidence, such as written documents, to support our arguments. Speaking of business, it would be much quicker, more time-saving and more convenient for a company to send emails regarding promotions and sales to a group of targeted customers than to meet and talk with every one of them.

In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, it seems to me that spoken words are more effective in situations when we need to use our gestures and show emotions, while written communication is preferable in law and business.

Sample 2:

When it comes to imparting and exchanging information, some people believe that speaking is more powerful than writing. Personally, I think that both methods can be effective forms of communication, but it depends on the specific circumstance as to which is the most appropriate at the time.

On the one hand, speaking is an extremely effective and efficient mode of communication in certain contexts. Oral communication enables people to emotionally connect with their listeners. The tone of someone’s voice can powerfully convey a wide range of emotions, and that is why some people are able to inspire and influence others simply through a powerful speech, or a song, or piece of poetry. Secondly, misunderstandings can also be easily prevented when people interact face to face. For example, if one person is confused about what the other is saying, he can immediately ask for further explanation to ensure that their message is completely understood.

On the other hand, writing can also be an effective tool in everyday communication. In the workplace, written messages, emails, and documents are effective tools, while speech may sometimes be ignored or interpreted in different ways, written forms are usually stated very clearly. Employees can therefore reread documents repeatedly to avoid miscommunication. Additionally, written documents are usually required in legal procedures. This is the reason why many important documents including memos, reports, job descriptions, and e-mails are usually kept in written form.

In conclusion, both spoken and written modes of communication have their own purposes, benefits and drawbacks, and people have to carefully consider which mode to apply in each specific situation.

Sample 3:

Communication plays an important part in the development of individuals. The thought that oral conversation is more successful than composed language is debatable. Some individuals guarantee that talking helps convey emotions and sentiments. Others think written language is more useful in transferring data. I am in agreement with the view that spoken communication is more beneficial than the written form.

When used properly, speaking can be an extremely effective and efficient way of communicating. People who use oral communication can make emotional connections with their listeners. People can effectively pass on many different feelings by using their voices, and this is why they are able to inspire others and influence them simply through a compelling speech, a song, or a poem. Your words can be interpreted differently when you use a certain tone, for instance, an emphatic voice while trying to convey a vehement sentence can make an extensive impact on the listener. In addition, face-to-face interactions also make it easier to avoid the misconceptions.

Furthermore, listening helps people to remember and comprehend more. Spoken communication helps us understand the pronunciations and accents of the speaker, something that is impossible through written communication. It may be better to use verbal communication when information is urgently needed, such as an emergency at stake or when the receiver has no access to writing instruments, such as young children.

Nevertheless, some people might argue that correspondence is better for someone who can’t convince others through speech, but it cannot always be a solution. Speaking skills provide a sense of accomplishment and personal development that writing cannot.

In conclusion, I am convinced that verbal interactions are more influential than written ones as the sense of understanding is quite efficient when body language and facial expressions are used.

Sample 4:

Whether written or oral is a more powerful form of communication has long been a subject of debate. Personally, I argue that neither of the forms could be said to be superior since there are nuances that can only be conveyed through either the spoken or written medium.

On the one hand, speeches have always been used as the primary method of addressing large masses of people, for they are more effective at conveying feelings of passion and excitement. Speakers, by lowering and increasing the volume of their voice, can alter the energy of an audience that writers cannot do as easily through the written word. It is no mistake that every political leader conveys their ideas and inspires their people through speeches: successful politicians of the past, such as Obama or Tony Blair, were also great orators who can excite a crowd?

On the other hand, the separation and impartiality of the written form allow the medium to paint more colorful and detailed worlds. The impersonal nature of writing also allows the written form to convey things that would be rejected through the spoken word, and engage in darker, more mature content that provokes the mind. This is why many people still read books since they help to paint a more vivid picture of the subject they are trying to convey. Due to the added layer of engagement required in reading as opposed to listening, readers can explore worlds in greater depth than listeners can.

Overall, I argue that speeches and the written word have different uses for they have distinct strengths and weaknesses, and it cannot be said that one is more powerful than the other.

Sample 5:

Many people opine that oral communication is more powerful than written communication. In this essay, I will explain why I disagree with this idea.

This idea often stems from the fact that spoken communication is the oldest form of communication. Also, it is used as the most common medium for the exchange of information as speakers can give utterance synchronously to their listeners who then are able to respond in real time. In contrast, written form, despite the longer response time, as a more reliable means of communication in the legal, academic and business world should be mentioned. Written documents and correspondences such as agreements, letters, emails, or books are kept as a source of reference while spoken conversations, even recorded, are not legalised and invalid in most cases.

Second, oral communication can facilitate face-to-face communication when speakers can not only use oral and verbal form but also non-verbal tools to convey the emotional message. For example, many political figures are articulate thanks to a combination of inspired words and their ability to read their audiences’ true feelings from facial expressions to adjust their delivery and meaning of speech. Therefore, it is believed that spoken communication is more important than the written one. Of course, writers might not have such luxury, but they seem to pay more attention, and actually have time to do so, to convey their ideas through written language with precise grammar and vocabulary, which are often simplified in spoken language. There are examples of books or pieces of text that are full of enthusiasm and represent effectively complex notions or emotional expressions.

In conclusion, it is difficult to decide whether spoken or written communication is more important than the other.  Both these mediums can play a key role in different circumstances and communication purposes.

Sample 6:

People communicate with each other via different platforms every day. Various types of communication can take place, but the two chief forms are spoken and written communication. Some believe that the former can have stronger impacts on humans compared to the latter. I totally disagree with this opinion as both are equally powerful and useful when used appropriately.

Speaking and listening to people can be effective in many situations. First, many people prefer to talk to others when it comes to personal issues as it is more intimate and is easy to express sympathy and empathy. Second, it is much faster to communicate with somebody by calling as opposed to writing or texting, especially when it comes to an emergency such as calling for an ambulance or seeking help from the police. Finally, an oral discussion is a much more convenient way to exchange ideas, clarify meaning and misunderstanding, or resolve conflicts as people can ask questions and seek responses immediately. Given that, spoken messages can easily be forgotten if not noted down, and speakers often have to repeat the message many times over to

reach the listeners unless the speech is recorded.

On the other hand, reading and writing are also widely used for their benefits. Writing books or journals is a great way to pass on your knowledge to a large audience as many readers can access the books at the same time. Furthermore, written documents can last a lifetime and can be translated into different languages, so they can reach a mass audience generation after generation. Although reading culture is deteriorating among the young, more people than ever before are engaging in online written communication such as writing a Twit or posting a status on their Facebook account.

In conclusion, both forms of communication are powerful in their own ways, and humans need to apply each one appropriately to become effective communicators.

Sample 7:

In modern times communication plays a vital role in our daily life. Communication is the key to interacting and building a reputation with people around. Oral communication is seen to be more successful than writing. Talking helps a person express emotion which does not happen in written texts. Some people also think that written language is more useful for communicating. I definitely go with the fact that spoken communication is much more effective than written ones.

Speaking is considered the most effective way to communicate with others. If the words are used properly, talking can display all kinds of emotions like anger, happiness, frustration, etc. The individuals using spoken communication can connect with the ones they are communicating with. They can rely on listeners. Voices convey actual emotions, and they are able to influence people through their speech. A speech can be compelling, and motivating, for the listeners. For instance, the listeners can understand the tone of the speaker’s mood. He or she can understand from the voice whether the said words were assertive or declarative. Moreover, face-to-face communication also makes communication easier. The chances of miscommunication diminish.

Additionally, listening can help people to memorize and understand more. Moreover, spoken communication helps to understand the accent and pronunciation of the speaker. Sometimes a few words are difficult to understand or pronounce. It is better to have verbal communication rather than writing. Also, during the time of emergency, a call to the receiver can help rather than writing and waiting for a reply.

Nevertheless, some people do prefer written communication as they can’t be convinced through their speech. It is difficult for them to reply then and there. But speaking skills can be enhanced through exercising the skills. It also helps in personal development and confidence building.

Lastly, to conclude, I believe that verbal communication has more advantages than written communication. Verbal communication helps to understand the body language and facial expression of the speaker which is not understandable in written communication.

Sample 8:

In today's fast-paced society, spoken communication is often preferred over written communication. I agree with the view that spoken communication is more beneficial than written communication. In this essay, I will explain the advantages and disadvantages of spoken communication to justify my opinion. From my perspective, interaction through our own voices has more beneficial impacts on our daily lives. Firstly, direct communication with people helps to convey emotions in a way that written communication cannot. This is an indispensable and crucial factor in creating long-term interactions. To seize various opportunities and to know people better, verbal communication is the best way. For example, the other day I was standing in line for admission to college. I talked to a few of the students standing with me in the long line. The wait was long, so we got time to speak to each other. Hence, from my freshman year onwards, I already have friends and many known faces thanks to striking up face-to-face conversations with different students. With the passing days, we connected more and more. The reason spoken communication is preferred is that body language and facial expressions can be observed, which helps to understand whether the speaker is talking about something good or bad. On the other hand, written communication restricts us from understanding and sympathizing with emotional feelings. As written communication lacks tone, voice, mood, emotions, and more, this can create misunderstanding as well. Secondly, spoken interaction can be enhanced through exercising the skills. It also helps in personal development and confidence building. For instance, in debate, directly speaking our views in front of a large group of people and waiting for their refusal, helps in the practice of critical thinking and quick response. In contrast, writing our opinions down and sending them may be good for introverts but waiting for a response might create a mishap. Hence, this might create disputes, and this online conversation will end quickly. In conclusion, I believe that verbal communication has more advantages than written communication. Verbal communication helps to understand the body language and facial expression of the speaker which is not understandable in written communication. It also allows for better emotional expression, personal development and opportunities for building relationships. Additionally, it allows for immediate feedback and helps to build critical thinking and quick response skills. Therefore, spoken communication is more beneficial in many aspects of our lives, from personal to professional.

Sample 9:

Some people are in favour of the power of speaking more than that of writing in communication. However, I believe that it all depends on the situations to decide which mode of meaning creation is more important than the other.

For some cases, oral speech conveys ideas and opinions most effectively. In programs like live political debates on television in elections, the sharpest weapon for would-be prime ministers or presidents is obviously their eloquent speeches. In such a live show, spontaneous answers to unexpected questions are usually decisive factors for the persuasive presentation of political stances which can earn them votes. Additionally, in closing sales, the power of convincing a lead to make purchasing decisions is largely dependent on the art of speaking of the salesperson, not on written texts in the product brochure. The power of speaking is also palpable in conflict resolution where typed ideas are not as detailed and well supported as oral reasoning and explanations. That is why people often have to talk their problems out instead of exchanging limited and even easily misunderstood texts.

However, for other purposes, written communication is better for task completion. Indeed, written texts are considered more formal than spoken ones, so in case of an invitation to an important event like a wedding, or a ceremony, letters of invitation are nearly the only means of communication accepted. Also, for working circumstances, the need to keep track of the correspondence among relevant parties is significant, and this inherently requires people to communicate by emails, faxes, or text messages instead of speaking face-to-face or via technological devices. Moreover, in special events like birthdays, or Christmas, a card with elaborated handwritten messages usually means much more than a ready-to-give wish on the tip of one's tongue.

In conclusion, both spoken and written communication are equally necessary for people to function in life, but it is a situational issue when one of them is more powerful than the other.

Sample 10:

It is argued that speaking is a more effective means of communication compared to written forms. However, I strongly disagree with this notion as both of them are capable of having a great influence on human society.

It is undeniable that verbal communication is potent as the emotions of the speaker can be conveyed simultaneously with the intended message. Listeners often experience a wide range of emotions, such as passion, excitement or even intimacy in the tone of the speaker, thus, rendering the main idea aiming at them more convincing and powerful. In contrast, reading about that same idea off a piece of paper may not be as effective because without proper manners of speaking, the audience may fail to comprehend the undertone of the message. For example, politicians often deliver speeches live rather than sending emails or letters because they have a higher chance of winning the general public with an eloquent manner, which can only be conveyed through speaking. As a result, their campaigns can gain more support from the appropriate use of spoken communication.

However, that does not mean written communication is ineffective. The power of such means lies in its reliability which is due to its unchangeability. When a piece of information is printed or written down, there is hardly anything that can be done to alter the meaning of the stored message. Therefore, the possibility of misinterpretation can be mitigated, protecting the authenticity of the information. The power of written words is often shown in contracts or legal documents; such materials are always subject to paperwork because they require a high level of legitimacy, which is better provided by written communication than the spoken one.

In conclusion, the two means of communication are equally powerful depending on the nature of the message. Each method has its own potential, so its use should be carefully considered to get a desired result.

Sample 11:

There is no doubt that there are many ways for two people to communicate, especially with the development of technology. It is frequently argued that written communication is not as effective as vocal communication. Personally, I share this opinion, and the supporting evidence for my viewpoint will be discussed in the lines that follow.

To begin with, the effectiveness of oral communication is the most important defense. It goes without saying that the likelihood of misinterpretation or misunderstanding is extremely low when people communicate face-to-face. Because in-person communication includes eye contact, mannerisms, body language, and other elements that are absent in printed language, people are able to elaborate on their points much more. This is possibly the reason why a sizable majority prefers verbal communication to convey their thoughts and feelings more effectively.

Additionally, verbal communication is the only practical way to send messages on time in the hectic world of today. Today, everyone has a cell phone, making it possible to make contact with anyone anywhere in the world. They can communicate verbally quickly, whereas individuals find reading and sending letters or emails to be much more time-consuming. According to a new Oxford University report, the use of email has decreased by 70% over the past five years due to the growing use of cellular telephones.

To sum up, I’d want to reiterate that verbal communication is unquestionably the most successful form of communication, given the low likelihood of miscommunication and its practicality in contemporary society when written communication sometimes looks laborious and unproductive.

Sample 12:

It is claimed that verbal types of communication are stronger than written ones. Personally, I completely agree with this idea because of some reasons which will be explained in this essay.

To begin with, spoken communication is a powerful way of influencing other people. Firstly, when one gives a speech verbally, they can use their powerful voice as well as gestures to make their talk more convincing. This helps them easily express their emotions and trigger empathy from listeners. For example, many motivational speakers have the ability to tell touching stories which could literally bring tears to people’s eyes. By contrast, if individuals read written messages, it could be difficult for them to visualize the writer’s ideas. Secondly, oral presentations can reach a large audience. For instance, it is possible to deliver a speech in front of thousands of participants in a public event, while it could be hard to publish sufficient documents to provide for the same amount of audience.

At the same time, written communication is less effective in terms of conveying messages. One reason for this is that in many underdeveloped areas around the world, a considerable number of citizens are illiterate. This means they cannot read books or newspapers, and oral speeches seem to be the only way to approach these people. Additionally, it takes a significant amount of time and effort to collect and publish the ideas of an author. Therefore, by the time the necessary information comes to the reader in the form of a book or a newspaper, it may have already become outdated.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that spoken ways of delivering messages are more influential, because they can heighten listeners’ feelings and reach a broader audience quickly. At the same time, in my view, written communication has a smaller impact, as it is time-consuming and also useless for illiterate individuals.

Sample 13:

Some people are of the opinion that spoken communication may have an edge over its written counterpart. From my perspective, both spoken and written forms are important in equal measure, and therefore I completely disagree with the statement.

Spoken language, on the one hand, facilitates our daily communication. Virtually all social activities that human beings engage in such as making purchases, exchanging information or chatting with friends entail people uttering words to one another, and it is not an overstatement to say lack of oral communication may render us unable to carry out any essential tasks in life.

Additionally, when combined with body language, facial expressions, and eye contact, oral communication exhibits strong emotional messages. Whilst political figures make persuasive, well-articulated speeches as an effective tool of persuasion and manipulation, women make full use of their sweet, melodious voices to talk their beloved ones into buying things they want to.

Written language, on the other hand, appears to be relegated and ignored. This is unfortunate because written communication has advantages that would make it a superior choice in some situations over oral communication. From a legal perspective, written language, in the form of legal documents, is instrumental in safeguarding the rights of the people.

Most contracts are carefully drawn up in written forms and require signatures, and therefore they are solid and hard to be breached. In contrast, so-called ‘agreements’ or ‘promises’ in oral forms, in most cases, are invalid.

Moreover, written language is a very efficient representation of complex notions, emotional expressions, and philosophies. Great minds store their ideas in books and novels, and those books have been instrumental in spreading their ideas to a much wider range of audiences. We can see written language as a way of indirectly conversing with not only one, but hundreds, thousands, or even millions of people.

In conclusion, my firm conviction is that both spoken and written communication are equally important in our society. Whereas spoken language enables us to do everyday tasks and effectively show our emotions, written language plays a pivotal role in legal matters and allows for great ideas to be spread to a lot of people.

Sample 14:

Regarding conveying and exchanging information, some individuals argue that speaking holds more power than writing. From my perspective, I believe that both approaches can serve as effective means of communication, yet the suitability depends on the particular context.

On the one hand, speaking is an extremely effective and efficient mode of communication in certain contexts. Oral communication enables people to emotionally connect with their listeners. The tone of someone’s voice can powerfully convey a wide range of emotions, and that is why some people are able to inspire and influence others simply through a powerful speech, or a song, or piece of poetry. Secondly, misunderstandings can also be easily prevented when people interact face to face. For example, if one person is confused about what the other is saying, he can immediately ask for further explanation to ensure that their message is completely understood.

On the contrary, writing can also serve as an effective tool in daily communication. In the workplace, written messages, emails, and documents are potent instruments, whereas speech might sometimes be disregarded or construed differently, written forms are generally expressed very clearly. Hence, employees can review documents repeatedly to prevent miscommunication. Moreover, written documents are typically indispensable in legal proceedings. This elucidates why many crucial documents including memos, reports, job descriptions, and emails are usually documented.

In summary, both verbal and written means of communication serve distinct purposes, advantages, and disadvantages, necessitating individuals to meticulously contemplate which approach to adopt in each specific circumstance.

Sample 15:

The fact that oral languages came into existence tens of thousands of years before written ones across virtually all civilizations makes many people think that spoken communication is more powerful than its written counterpart. This essay argues against this one-dimensional ideology and claims that both forms of communication are equally influential in its own right.

On the one hand, the power of spoken communication derives from its ability to convey information directly and more effectively during face-to-face interactions. Exposed to not only words but also visible emotions and body language, listeners can fully grasp the messages being conveyed and how strongly the speakers really believe in those messages. The revolutionary “I Have a Dream” speech by Dr. Martin Luther King perfectly illuminates this argument. While each word in this historic speech is undoubtedly moving and inspirational, it was the strong, relentless emotions that Dr. King displayed in his speech that rallied support from people all around the globe to his anti-segregation movement.

On the other hand, what constitute the strength of written communication are the official recognition and the social prestige that written documents command. Simply put, written communication is permanent and there are many ways to distinguish the writings of figures of authority, such as signatures or stamps, and hence, it carries more weight. The Constitution of the United States, for example, was written in the 18th century but is still upheld and respected up until this day because it was written by the revered founders of the country, Benjamin Franklin and George Washington. Documents written by famous people in positions of power, as a result, will be more widely accepted and withstand the test of time due to their association with personal reputations.

All things considered, it is imprudent to conclude that one form of communication is better than the other, as both forms have their own strengths and weaknesses, and it depends on the purpose of the users to determine which one is more ...