Sample 1:

Some people opine that the use of cell phones in public places such as libraries, shops, and public vehicles should be prohibited as it causes great annoyance to other people. Personally, I disagree with this point of view as I believe that with proper use, mobiles are still helpful.

On the one hand, it is true that mobile phones can be intrusive in public areas. For example, in places like libraries, where people are supposed to keep silent and concentrate on their books or reading materials, a mobile ringtone or a phone conversation can totally divert their attention, thereby disrupting the ideal work environment. Besides, mobile phones can be used to take photos of other people without their permission. On public means of transport like a bus, for instance, one can easily snap a photo of others without them even knowing. This not only invades their personal privacy but can also lead to potential risks, such as someone’s pictures being sold for commercial purposes or even other negative intentions.

On the other hand, despite the aforementioned disadvantages, mobile phones are useful in a number of ways. First and foremost, these devices are not necessarily synonymous with irritation since they can easily be turned into silent or vibrate mode. Furthermore, they are a real help in many adverse circumstances in public places. In case of emergencies, for example, a road accident, residents will have certain difficulties calling for the ambulance without phones. Additionally, when connected to the Internet via WiFi or 3G, these technological gadgets are a cheap source of entertainment on the move, comforting people on tedious journeys or in anxious situations. Therefore, a ban on mobile phones will deprive people of the undeniable benefits these devices provide.

In conclusion, although mobile phones may cause disturbance for the public, I maintain that they are advantageous if used properly.

Sample 2:

Some people applaud the prohibition of mobile phones in public spaces considering the possible disturbances resulting from notifications and bright screens. However, I believe mobile phones should be allowed in order to enable convenience for individuals at public facilities.

On the one hand, other members of the public at places such as libraries, shops and public transport might find sounds and the light from phones annoying. For instance, readers at a library can be distracted by disrespectful phone users who switch on the ringtone of incoming calls or through notification noises, preventing them from devoting their full time to research and reading. A related and common instance would be that a traveler’s short nap on a bus or night train might be interrupted by the bright lights emanating from smartphone screens.  

On the other hand, I believe that handheld devices can greatly improve user experience. For example, a bus journey is less tiring when the rider can enjoy some relaxing music to relieve stress on his phone by using his earphones, avoiding the noise of traffic and immersing himself in the healing sounds of nature. Another great example is the use of shopping applications such as VinID, an application recently developed by the Vietnamese retail giant Vinmart+. Thise app enables shoppers to not only precisely locate their desired items in vast supermalls but also to use self-service checkout without needing to wait in seemingly endless queues during peak shopping hours.

In conclusion, although the use of phones might be a distraction in public spaces, I am of the opinion that the total experience of users in public places is more important. Therefore, service operators should invest more in researching user behavior to develop more useful apps.

Sample 3:

The ubiquity of mobile phones has become a contentious issue in recent years, to the point that some have argued for a ban on these devices in public places. Despite some reasons to support this belief, I am inclined to disagree with it, as such a ban would be harmful and unnecessary.

There are sound arguments in favor of prohibiting mobiles in public space. A major one is that cell phones can be disruptive and distracting. In a library, for example, the ringtone of a phone can interfere with the concentration of other patrons who are trying to study or work. Moreover, this kind of ban may prevent children from picking up unhelpful habits. Without a ban, some children can witness adults using phones in public and attempt to imitate such behavior, consequently becoming glued to mobile devices. This is undoubtedly detrimental to children’s ability to concentrate and could affect their academic performance as well. A ban on mobile phones in public places, therefore, could reduce disruption and improve the young’s habits.

However, prohibiting cell phones in spaces open to the public should not be supported. Firstly, mobile phones can be a useful tool for communication and safety. If somebody is on public transport alone and facing an emergency, they may need to contact someone else, such as the police. A mobile phone ban in this case would prevent them from receiving help. Additionally, this policy could place an unnecessary constraint on people’s freedom of information. As mobile phones can access and spread knowledge conveniently, those who are affected by a ban would indeed feel restricted and become unhappy. Hence, outlawing mobile usage this way can end up doing more harm than good.

In conclusion, while there are arguments in favor of banning mobile phones in public places, it is not a positive measure. Instead, it is recommended to come up with gentler solutions for problems caused by public usage of cell phones, instead of banning these devices outright.

Sample 4:

Mobile phones in this modern world play a vital role in sharing information and bringing people closer. Due to its constant usage, it has become a basic necessity and some feel that prohibiting mobile phone usage in public places is a good move. However, I partially agree with it and believe that allowing it in public places with some restrictions will be fine. This essay will talk about both cases with proper examples.

To begin with, using cell phones in public spaces might be a distraction to other people and divert their attention. For example, in libraries where people are found reading books of their interest, they can be easily distracted when a person’s ringtone of an incoming call strikes all of a sudden or when any individual is found talking over the phone in a loud manner. Moreover, using phones in places like hospitals can also easily interfere with the serene environment that is a much needed one for the patients. Hence, restricting people from using mobiles in these kinds of common places can help fellow mates to carry on with their lives peacefully.

On the other hand, prohibiting the usage of mobile phones in public spaces can cause problems for people as well in some instances. For example, if an individual wanted to contact their loved ones in case of an emergency, they wouldn’t be able to reach them instantly without a mobile phone in hand. Adding on to this, people usually love listening to music during travel and mobile phones can without hassle be switched to a silent mode, and this will not disturb others.

In conclusion, I, in fact, believe that phones can be allowed in public places but with some specific restrictions so that people can remain in touch with their friends and family members whenever they need to.

Sample 5:

Recently, it has been suggested that people should not be allowed to use mobile phones in public places. In my view, although this ban could have certain benefits, it is highly impractical and therefore should not be implemented.

Proponents of a mobile phone ban often point to cases when phone use in public areas is intrusive. In a library, sometimes concentration is disturbed by someone making/taking phone calls or incoming SMS sounds. Phone use can also ruin the experience for others, as is the case where some moviegoers constantly use their phone, which emits annoying blue light or interrupts others with sounds from texting. More importantly, phone use in public allows for privacy intrusion. This happens when someone takes pictures or videos of others without their knowledge and uses them for unlawful purposes, with consequences ranging from unintended inconvenience to outright invasion of privacy. With a mobile phone ban in place, the number of the aforementioned incidences would decrease, making for a less interrupted experience when using publicly accessible services.

Nonetheless, such a ban is unrealistic because, for most people, mobile phones have become an indispensable part of life. Individuals in the technological era utilize the mobile phone for various tasks, both personal and professional. For instance, mobile technology has made it possible to check out quickly and conveniently in shops and supermarkets. Digital maps are now available via mobile devices, helping people navigate more easily. Another reason for phone use is to minimize boredom by listening to music or surfing the internet while waiting, say, for the bus. Besides, many people have to be by their phones even after work; without a phone, their productivity might be compromised. In short, a prohibition of phone use would unnecessarily deprive people of the important benefits of technology.

In conclusion, while a ban on the phone may ensure people’s experience in public places, it is outweighed by its impracticality, given the fact that the phone has been an integral part of life.

Sample 6:

Mobile phones have become not only increasingly ubiquitous over the last few decades but also an integral part of modern life. It is, however, believed by some that there should be a ban on those devices in public areas. I think this is an unreasonable suggestion and should not be adopted.

Banning phones in public places seems impractical owing to their importance when it comes to communication for work reasons. The majority of jobs these days require employees to be constantly available for any problem that may crop up. For example, doctors need to be ready all the time for any emergency or surgery that needs their presence, which requires them to have their phones with them at any place, even in public areas. Therefore, if cellular devices are prohibited in such places, people’s daily work will be hindered to a great extent.

Apart from communication functions, mobile phones nowadays can serve as a device for multiple purposes, which are of great use in public places. In libraries, people can use their phones to search for different sources of information that are not available in paper books. Or phones also enable consumers to compare the price of a particular product between different shops so that they can make a wise purchasing decision. Another striking feature of cellphones in recent years is their built-in GPS, which allows, for example, owners to search for directions while traveling or parents to track their children so as to avoid the risk of kidnapping. Those electronic gadgets are also a huge source of entertainment for people to while away the time by reading news, watching films or playing games when taking public transport.

Opponents of mobile use in public places may argue that phones’ rings and sounds can disturb the surrounding people and ruin their experience; nevertheless, this can easily be solved by switching phones to silent mode.

In conclusion, there are no reasons to put a prohibition on mobile phones in public areas as long as they are used with respect to others.

Sample 7:

Telecommunication technology has played a vital role in information sharing and bringing people closer. Its usage has become a basic necessity of life, and one cannot imagine living without mobile phones. The prohibition of cell phones in public places is laudable, but I don't agree fully and believe that their usage should be allowed in public places but with some restrictions.

On the one hand, using mobile phones in public places can distract other people and divert their attentions. For instance, libraries where people reading material of interest can be easily distracted through ringtones of incoming calls or people talking over the phone loudly with their loved ones. Mobile phone usage in public places like hospitals can easily interfere with the medical equipment which can be harmful to the patient. Moreover, talking over the cell phone can increase the suffering of the patients waiting in the room to see the doctor. Mobile phones can easily slip from the hand when someone bumps in department stores. It will not only damage the devices, but it can block the entire lane at the billing counter. Often the environment at shopping malls, stores and other public avenues is very noisy and talking over cell phones will add extra decibel. Moreover, its usage in Music galleries or prayers room can result in discomfort for others and spoil their entertainment or offerings.

On the other hand, restricting usage of mobile phones in public places can keep people away from staying in touch with their loved one in case of emergency and so on. Mobile phones nowadays come up with cameras and other services like Email, Entertainment and so on. This would keep them away from capturing the pictures of events in music galleries or taking selfies in public buses and sharing with their friends on the go. Moreover, people who love to listen to music while travelling will have little to enjoy. Cell phones can easily be switched to silent/vibrate mode, this will not distract people due to loud ringtones of incoming calls or messages.

To conclude, the above points provide plausible arguments in favour of both views. However, I personally believe that cell phones should be allowed in public places but with some restrictions in place so that they can remain in touch with their friends and family members whenever they need. 

Sample 8:

Nowadays, mobile phones have become an inevitable part of life. Although they have made communication much easier in each step of our daily life, some people opine that they should be restricted in public places such as libraries, shops and public vehicles. I totally support the view and the reasons for this will be discussed below.

Firstly, public places are usually expected to be quiet and peaceful so that they are acceptable to everyone and the use of mobile phones in such places is likely to disrupt the desirable working environment. For instance, in a library, where people are pondering over the books, the constant mobile ringtones or the phone conversation will be intrusive or irritating.

Secondly, the use of mobile phones for luring activities as facebook chatting, taking pictures, playing games, listening to songs and so on can prove to be undesirable in public places. It is quite noticeable that these days, teenagers are taking pictures everywhere, at libraries, trains, buses, roads, hospitals etc which is a matter of annoyance. An example of this is my friend, who once was taking selfies continuously on the train when the passenger beside her got offended. For these reasons, restrictions on mobile phones in public places would prove to be useful in creating a sense of comfort in public.

In a nutshell, although the merits of mobile phones are numerous, it would be a definitely good decision to ban them in public places as it would create a sense of comfort and a harmonious environment for all.

Sample 9:

The mobile phone has become the most popular gadget in today’s world. Some people argue that usage of cell phones should be prohibited in public places. Personally, I completely agree with this idea due to many reasons.

In my opinion, there are many health and social problems that can occur as a result of using mobile phones in public places. Socially, a mobile phone can be described as an intrusive tool. It can disturb others while they are concentrating and reading in some places like libraries. Mobile phone etiquette is an important issue when mobile ringing at movies or in the libraries. Users often speak with loud volume and annoy the other people nearby. It has become common practice for places like bookshops and libraries to post a sign prohibiting the usage of mobile phones.  Also, many public trains offer 'quiet zones' where phone use is banned.

Another lethal concern is the health problems that can be caused by using cell phones in public places. Firstly, I believe that there is a strong correlation between the usage of the mobile phone in public places, like public transportation, and the increased numbers of traffic accidents. Mobile has been a major distraction on the road even when using the ‘hands-free' system (talking without the involvement of the hands). Some studies have shown that talking on a phone while driving is equally impairing as drinking and driving.  Secondly, there are possible radiation impacts on the brain from mobile phones, with increased possibility of certain types of tumours in long - time, to persistent heavy users.

Finally, the signal of mobile phones can cause serious problems in some public places like hospitals and public transport by interfering with the signal of medical and communication devices. Even in public transport if any patient wears an implanted heart device, the mobile phone can interfere with it, and it could be stopped completely. So mobile phones can have fatal consequences for patients in the hospital and other public places.

In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, I believe that the use of cell phones in public places should be prohibited completely.

Sample 10:

This is a true fact to consider that in the present days the mobile phone has become a vital part of our life and the majority of the people in the world are using it. However, this biggest revolution seems like has been a cause for irritation in some places. Considering this some analysts insist that mobile phones should be banned in public places. I staunchly agree with the above-recommended proposition due to a variety of notable reasons.

There are significant facts and reasons that affirm that mobile phones should be banned in places like hospital, public bus, train, library, shops, convention centres and many other public places because it has been the reason for the annoyance of other people in many ways. First and foremost, distraction could be a significant factor why people get annoyed when other people talk loudly over their mobile phones. For instance, a library mainly focuses on providing a quiet environment for readers; however, when people use mobile phones inside the libraries, the serenity of the environment is lost. The mobile phone should be completely banned in the hospital as it not only disturbs the patients and others but could also tamper with the highly sophisticated machines that are used to diagnosis patients. The mobile phone usages in private cars are one of the main reasons for increased road accidents these days. The use of this device in public transportation is also a violation of privacy and people’s right to travel peacefully.  

In spite of the views discussed above regarding banning the mobile phone in public places, there are some groups who consider mobile phones should not be banned in public places. They opine that this is the primary communication device for people and if it is banned, people would suffer greatly and would face many incomprehensible inconveniences. For instance, if someone is travelling in a public vehicle and his office needs to update him for a very urgent issue, banning the use of cell phone would make it impossible. Banning cell phones in places like shopping mall would make it impossible for people to get directions to a shop, compare products online and make an informed decision about purchasing a product.

In summary, due to some benefits offered by the mobile phone usages in public places, it would be hard to ban its usages in public places. However, I think that imposing some restrictions on mobile phone usages in public places would be a better idea.

Sample 11:

Mobiles have made communication easier and more convenient. However, sometimes people talking on their mobile phone disturb the surrounding environment and the general public. Because of this reason, several people have opined that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries, shops and on buses and trains. I agree with this view.

When people traveling on a bus or train make or receive calls on their mobile phone, they are causing a great deal of disturbance to other passengers. In order to ensure that the listener can hear properly, the caller often talks too loudly. This can disturb fellow passengers who may be reading or sleeping. And when people driving a vehicle talk on their mobiles, it can result in fatal accidents. This cannot be allowed at all.

Libraries are another place where the use of mobile phones should be banned or discouraged. Library is meant for reading and thinking. If people use mobile phones when they are inside the library, they will unnecessarily disturb other people reading or studying there.

By simply banning mobiles in public places, we cannot perhaps solve this problem. We also need to create awareness about the proper and polite way to use mobiles in public places.

Mobile phones have become an integral part of our lives. In fact, most of us can’t even imagine a life without our mobiles. They are also a blessing in emergencies. In such situations, their use must be permitted.

To conclude, there is a real need to ban the use of mobile phones in public places. It is true that they are a necessity and have enriched our lives in many ways, but their excessive use in public places must be discouraged at any cost.

Sample 12:

There have been growing concerns about mobile phone use in public, which leads to proposed restrictions on it. From my perspective, this would be too heavy-handed a measure which does more harm than good on the whole.

Admittedly, the opposition to phone usage in public spaces comes from seemingly legitimate reasons. The ringtones and loud conversations on the phone could act as a disturbance to other people. A case in point is a library where readers’ attention is likely to be disrupted by ringing sounds, or a chilling experience at a peaceful coffee shop being ruined by a fellow customer talking too loud on the phone. Despite this argument, a blanket ban on phones would highly likely prove impractical. Phones have been so integrated into our everyday life that the resulting inconvenience of their ban would be massive. This, coupled with the ease of turning on and off one’s phone within seconds, would suggest a high rate of no-phone policy violation. A more acceptable solution would be to require phone owners to use silent mode or to detach themselves from the crowd when a call is coming in.

A strong argument for the right to use mobile phones in public is probably their role in ensuring personal safety and facilitating everyday activities. In the wake of the Covid-19 outbreak, mobile payment, which allows transactions to be conducted conveniently and contactless, is increasingly becoming the norm. With this payment method, the risks of disease transmission could be significantly mitigated as payers could make a wireless transaction to the intended recipient, and if it is a store visit, the add-in QR code-scanning feature allows customers and cashiers to be separated by a transparent screen. Moreover, in an emergency in public, it would be faster and more practical to make a call to seek support. An individual surrounded by fire in a building, for example, could find it safer to reach for his or her phone and contact fire departments instead of crossing the fire to approach the fire alarm.

In conclusion, the inconvenience caused by mobile phone usage in public could easily be eclipsed by the benefits it brings about, making the ban on it arguably insensible. A more viable alternative would be regulation on appropriate mobile phone use in public.

Sample 13:

The issue of whether mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries, shops, and on public transport has generated significant debate. While some advocate for a ban to maintain public decorum and tranquility, others argue that such a measure would be overly restrictive and impractical. I contend that while some regulations are necessary, a complete ban is not warranted.

One compelling argument for banning mobile phones in certain public places is the need to maintain a quiet and respectful environment. For instance, in libraries where people go to study or read in peace, the intrusion of ringing phones and loud conversations can be extremely disruptive. Similarly, on public transport, incessant phone use can disturb passengers who may wish to rest or travel in silence. In Vietnam, many public libraries already request patrons to keep their phones on silent mode, demonstrating a compromise that respects both the need for quiet and the practicalities of modern communication. If people adhered to these guidelines more rigorously, the need for a complete ban would likely diminish. This approach suggests that regulation, rather than prohibition, can effectively address the issue of noise pollution.

However, I believe that imposing a total ban on mobile phones in public places is neither practical nor necessary. Mobile phones have become essential tools for daily life, providing access to information, emergency services, and communication. For example, a shopper may need to check product reviews or prices online, and a commuter might rely on navigation apps to reach their destination. Banning phones outright would deprive individuals of these conveniences, leading to frustration and potential safety issues. Additionally, enforcing such a ban would be challenging and could create unnecessary conflicts between authorities and the public. Instead, promoting responsible usage through public awareness campaigns and designated quiet zones could mitigate disturbances without the need for a blanket ban.

In conclusion, while the disruptive potential of mobile phones in public places cannot be ignored, a complete ban is excessive and impractical. Implementing regulations and promoting respectful usage can preserve the benefits of mobile technology while maintaining public order. This balanced approach ensures that public spaces remain harmonious without unnecessarily restricting the advantages of mobile phones.

Sample 14:

There have been recent calls for the regulation of mobile phones in public areas. In my opinion, though this would have a positive effect on social interactions, a complete ban is unrealistic and impractical.

Those in favour of such sweeping reforms can point to reduced communication in society. Look inside any public space, whether it be a library, a store, a bus, or a park, and most likely the majority of individuals will be staring at their phones. This stands in stark contrast to the days before smartphones when people had to resort to talking to each other, or, at worst, reading a book to curb social anxiety. In the last two decades, mobiles have greatly reduced chance encounters, potential friendships, and conversations with both strangers and friends. The long-term effects of this are still unknown but it is safe to say that future generations will be less sociable and dynamic and more isolated and passive.

Nonetheless, banning phones in public is purely theoretical as they have become indispensable. Most jobs require employees to either be available by phone, for example doctors and police officers, or to use their phones throughout the day, as is common with businessmen and lawyers. This means most people must have their phone on them in public places for work reasons. Moreover, phone addiction has reached a point where nearly everyone in public is either messaging, playing a game, reading the news, or scrolling through social media. These have become important escapes for individuals and serve the practical purpose of minimising boredom during breaks and while waiting. Phones are therefore no longer a luxury but a key ingredient in daily life.

In conclusion, despite the impact of phones on social interaction, I believe a ban would interfere too much with ingrained habits. It is instead the responsibility of individuals to police their own behaviour.

Sample 15:

Mobile phones have become an integral part of our daily lives, offering convenience, connectivity, and information at our fingertips. The debate over whether mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries, shops, and on public transport is a contentious issue. In this essay, I will argue against the complete ban of mobile phones in public places.

Firstly, it is important to acknowledge the potential disruptions that mobile phones may cause. There is no denying that in some cases, loud phone conversations or constant notification sounds in quiet environments like libraries can be annoying. However, this does not mean that a complete ban is necessary. Instead, public awareness campaigns and strict guidelines on phone etiquette can be more effective in managing such behavior.

On the other hand, mobile phones provide essential services, especially in cases of ...