It is true that volunteer work provides great benefits for both participants and the community. However, forcing the youth to engage in those activities may be counterproductive, as now will be explained.

On the one hand, if young people were required to do social jobs for free, there would be certain advantages for all sides related. A vast majority of the younger population are energetic, dynamic and passionate about improving themselves, and it is the unpaid work that can satisfy that demand. Charitable campaigns such as teaching primary schoolchildren or helping the elderly with their daily activities provide the participants with not only new knowledge and skills, but also a sense of community and a belief that they are a pivotal part of societies. Vice versa, the government, with the assistance from young people, has a productive workforce available for charity work without wasting money on the recruitment process.

On the other hand, I believe that the disadvantages of this are more important. Working on a volunteer basis may distract young people from their priorities. For example, students of state universities and colleges are expected to attend lessons, complete homework and even consult external academic materials. With such a heavy workload, those students should spend their little remaining time relaxing or playing sports rather than joining free social activities. Regarding those who do not go to school, vocational or internship courses are what they should seek for. Professional skills from such classes are tools for these individuals to achieve a stable later life; therefore, the community should allow them to pursue their career.

In conclusion, the youth can choose to support others, and the volunteer work should never be made obligatory.

Nowadays, there is an increase in the trend of distance learning. Several people believe that this method has a total of positive impacts and it will alter conventional education while others say that argue that it is impossible to eliminate brick and mortar classroom. This essay will discuss both opinions.

To begin with, there are some advantages to attending a virtual classroom. First and foremost, learning via the internet is time-consuming for both students and schools. For example, students can learn anything and anywhere provided that they have a computer connecting to the internet. In terms of teachers, they can deliver a lesson to all classes by video instead of teaching the same things again and again. Secondly, online education saves costs for the country. For instance, schools can reduce overhead costs or decline the budget for investing in facilities since expanding campus is not necessary. In addition, e-learning provides opportunities for people who live far from the university. The fact shows that many residents in remote rural areas still have chances to achieve degrees thanks to this advanced technology.

On the other hand, face-to-face learning plays an integral part in education. Firstly, interactive learning is more effective than online learning. In detail, when discussing one topic, teachers can give some feedback for students to make sure that they understand all their mistakes and improve these errors. Moreover, studying under supervision motivates students to learn hard. Due to the fact that there are a huge number of students who are lazy and not self-aware in learning, it is essential for them to have tutors who control students' studies and help them have good academic results.

In conclusion, although there are a bunch of positive influences which online learning brings, I strongly believe that traditional education is a good teaching method that is irreplaceable. It not only helps students have more interaction with classmates but also provides them an environment to improve skills and learn new things together.