These days it seems that more rural young people are a migration to urban areas than ever before. Under 30 years old people think that cities offer more opportunities. I would argue that the overall impact of this trend has in fact been negative. Some of the primary drawbacks associated with this issue are as follows.
First of all, it is an indisputable fact that the city has more job possibilities than the rural area. People who live in villages can just work as a teacher, doctor or peasant. Moreover, life degree and an amount of salary is considerably low than the city. For example, in Kazakhstan doctor who works in villages ambulance earn 100-150 dollar per month while city hospital surgery or therapist’s salary is about 1000 dollars. Consequently, students do not to come back their villages after the university for 100 dollars. Another contributing factor that is more developing countries tend to pour more money to built modern architectures in cities and organize summits, sports events. As a result, the rural area population suffers and villages’ life level is decreasing.
Unfortunately, this trend is a tremendous stroke for the country and the whole world. This influx leads to overpopulation and pollution in cities. Moreover, the city is not balloon and has an area limit. If the number of inhabitants in the city goes up, the government faces with dwelling and staple problems. As a result, the poverty level enhances in the country. Even more disturbing fact that nation GDP deteriorates since rural area offers staples such as drain and meet.
To sum up, the challenges presented by the leaving the rural area are numerous and complex. This trend aggravates nations economy, therefore, the authority must salvage and open more work places in the rural area.

Along with the rapid development of global economy, young people are tending to move from countryside to big cites to work or study. The essay will address the root cause of this tendency before reaching the conclusion why I strongly believe that the disadvantages outnumber its advantages.

To begin with, the truth holds that there are two predominant causes relating to this trend. In the first place; schools, universities and firms, which are well-known in their fields, always concentrate in big cities such as Hanoi and HCMC. Therefore, it causes the transitions of young people to these cities for studying and working. Besides that, big cities normally receive a great deal of concern from the government and local authorities. They spent money investing in infrastructures, road systems, hospital and so on; as a result, the standard of living is significantly improved. Consequently, people living in rural areas, are tending to move to cities with the aim of looking for better lives.

However, it is argued by some people that this trend is not really conducive to the mankind. First and foremost, the transitions would create a great pressure on public services for instance public transport, health care, facilities and so on. It increases the bumper to bumper traffics, incessant roar in crowed areas leading to the impairment of standard of living. Furthermore, there are some arguments that this tendency not only makes higher unemployment rates but also the criminal rates in society. It is because the job market becomes more competitive when working demand goes up dramatically while jobs are limited. Therefore, authorities would have to spend more money on unemployment insurance and public protecting, so that budget deficit is inevitable.

Broadly speaking, although moving tendency may bring about some beneficial impacts, its disadvantages seem to overweigh advantages. Nonetheless, I honestly think that the situation would be improved if the government could propose some feasible solutions to deal with these problems.