Sure, let's break down the opinions and address each question.

**Supporting Opinion:**
1. **Main Idea:** Books are better than movies because we can read them anywhere.
2. **Supporting Ideas:**
- We only need a book to read, whereas watching a movie requires a television, cell phone, or computer.
- These devices need electricity to work, so if there's no power or the battery is dead, it's not possible to watch a movie.
- Books can still be used even if they are dropped or get wet, while cell phones usually break and stop working if dropped.

**Opposing Opinion:**
1. **Main Idea:** Watching a movie is better than reading a book.
2. **Supporting Ideas:**
- Movies are more exciting due to special effects and amazing computer graphics, making us feel like we are in the story or another world.
- Books are boring, long, have no pictures, and sometimes smell strange.
- Watching a movie can be a social activity with friends, whereas reading a book is a solitary activity and can be boring.

**Examples to Support the Ideas:**

**Supporting Opinion Examples:**
- **Portability:** You can read a book on a bus, in a park, or even during a power outage, whereas you need a charged device and power to watch a movie.
- **Durability:** If you accidentally drop a book in water, you can dry it out and still read it. Dropping a cell phone in water often results in a broken device that may not work anymore.

**Opposing Opinion Examples:**
- **Special Effects:** Movies like "Avatar" or "The Avengers" use cutting-edge CGI to create immersive experiences that books can't replicate.
- **Social Activity:** Watching a movie like "The Lord of the Rings" with friends can be a fun group activity, complete with shared reactions and discussions, whereas reading the book alone might not provide the same social interaction.

These examples help illustrate the points made in each opinion and provide concrete scenarios to support the arguments.