Sample 1:

Due to the rapid development of technology today, many people think that children no longer need to go to school to study. Instead, they can learn from the Internet and be home-schooled. I strongly disagree with this statement, however.

It is common knowledge that children are not the most self-disciplined demographic, and that studying is not the most relaxing activity. This means that there have to be some forms of supervision to ensure children are studying instead of slacking off. Many parents think they can fulfill this responsibility, but in reality, having one parent stay at home to take care of their child’s education does more harm than good. Firstly, this will put more financial pressure on the working parents to make ends meet for the family. Secondly, the pedagogical style of the teaching parent might not be suitable for the children, making home-schooling ineffective.  

Another reason why I think kids should not learn from the Internet or be home-schooled is the detrimental effects on their communication skills. For most children, school is not only a source of education but also a place where they can meet other kids, teachers, and other staff members. Some of the most beautiful and long-lasting friendships and romantic relationships stem from middle or high school, for example. Moreover, by meeting other children, parents can acknowledge some standards to which they should compare their children; hence, knowing if their children’s development is on par with others.    

In conclusion, although the benefits technology brings to education are undeniable, I strongly disagree that children do not need to go to school because of this. Schools are an effective use of educational workers and provide children with chances to communicate with other children as well as teachers and staff members.

Sample 2:

In today's digital age, the internet has revolutionized the way we access information and communicate with others. Some individuals argue that schools are no longer necessary due to the wealth of knowledge available on the internet and that children can learn just as well at home. However, I strongly disagree with this viewpoint.

Firstly, schools offer a wide range of opportunities that children cannot get at home. These include extracurricular activities, sports teams, and social interactions with peers and teachers. Schools provide a structured environment that allows children to develop essential social skills, such as teamwork, communication, and leadership. These skills are not only important for personal growth but also for future success in the workforce.

Secondly, while the internet provides a vast amount of information, it is not always reliable or accurate. Children may find it difficult to distinguish credible sources from those that are not trustworthy, leading to misinformation and confusion. In contrast, schools provide a structured curriculum that has been designed by educational professionals and is based on proven teaching methods.

Moreover, schools have trained teachers who can provide individualised attention and support to students. They can identify areas of weakness and provide additional help to students who need it, something that is difficult to achieve at home. Additionally, schools have access to resources such as textbooks, laboratories, and equipment that are not readily available to most families.

In conclusion, students can use the internet as an aid to their study, but schools play a vital role in their learning and cannot be replaced no matter what. Schools offer a structured and supportive environment that provides opportunities for personal growth, social interaction, and access to resources that are essential for a well-rounded education.

Sample 3:

The rise of the Internet and the information explosion in recent years, according to some educationalists, have paved the way for full-fledged e-learning and will eventually make traditional schooling practices obsolete. While this new modality does have unique benefits, it is unlikely a viable alternative to the tried-and-tested classroom approach for three main reasons.

The primary concern about web-based tuition is the lack of guidance by professional educators. Content available online is, in most cases, intended for purposes other than education, so it is often not possible for parents alone to accurately assess their suitability for their children. Experienced teachers, on the other hand, can be much more efficient at curating age-appropriate materials and finetuning learning tasks to suit the needs of their students.

Another reason against virtual learning is the difficulty of removing distractions in the home environment. When seated in front of a laptop at a dining table, casual conversations between family members and sudden noises in the kitchen can divert children’s attention away from the content they are working on. In comparison, a designated classroom and teacher supervision can mean uninterrupted attention during class hours and therefore better outcomes in the long run.

A further, often neglected, factor is the amount of time and attention required on responsible adults. Many parents who are preoccupied with work often struggle to spend quality time with their children, while households with a stay-home mom or dad can suffer from reduced financial capacity. It is therefore understandable for many families to opt for a school-based solution rather than going through the trouble of homeschooling or enrolling their children on cloud-based tuition programmes.

In conclusion, I think schools will continue as the main venue of learning, mainly for the irreplaceable values explained above. That said, a blended approach where online activities supplement, rather than replace, classroom instruction can be a sound solution for the digital native generation.

Sample 4:

In the era of technological advancements, the availability of information on the internet has raised the question of whether traditional schools are still necessary. Whilst it is true that there are myriad benefits to online learning. I believe that schools still play a crucial role in educating children.

On one hand, the disappearance of schools may seem plausible because of the abundance of online learning resources. With the accessibility of multimedia learning materials, such as cybraries, tutorial videos with captivating visuals, and audio lessons, children with different learning styles can all benefit. Additionally, the integration of AI with vast knowledge, for example, ChatGPT means that children can quickly get responses to their inquiries, whether it be general knowledge, math solutions, or clues for essays. Hence, these advancements in internet information have paved the way for distant learning to become more appealing than daily attendance at conventional physical schools.

However, it is imperative to recognise that the reliability and validity of online learning resources are uncertain since the information may be obsolete or inappropriate for young children to access. Therefore, this is one of the compelling reasons for the continuation of schools, which provide formal learning guidance to young students. With well-qualified teaching staff at academies driven by a uniform national curriculum, pupils are less susceptible to distorted and false information. They are instead directed properly to broaden their horizons. Moreover, schools supply immature students with values beyond mere acquisition of knowledge. That is to say, children are given opportunities to socialise and establish long-lasting friendships and through such in-person contacts, they can also acquire and further develop social skills such as active listening, negotiation, and communication. Furthermore, qualities such as compassion, kind- heartedness, and mutual respect can be fostered in the younger generation.

In conclusion, while the accessibility of online information promotes autonomy in children's learning, its verification is still doubtful. Meanwhile, by providing a formal learning environment, socialisation opportunities, and moral guidance, schools offer a comprehensive education that cannot be replaced by the internet.

Sample 5:

Since there is a wealth of information available on the Internet, students can study by themselves at home just as effectively as they do at school; and therefore, some people believe that schools are not needed anymore. In my view, much as I agree that students can study well at home with the help of the Internet, I feel that schools play a vital role in our society and cannot be replaced no matter what.

There are ways for children to learn from the Internet, most of which are either free or affordable for almost everyone. One great way is from online newspapers and video websites such as National Geographic and Youtube, which offers a variety of topic areas suitable for people of different ages. Children can learn a great deal of knowledge about culture, science, and many other areas which they are taught at schools. Also, they can participate in online courses favored by a growing number of youths nowadays. This type of learning is even more advantageous in the sense that children can flexibly choose to study whatever subjects they are interested in.

That being said, my conviction is that formal education is irreplaceable in any society. It is true that students can acquire knowledge at home very easily with the help of the Internet; however, lack of teachers’ guidance and peer support is a clear disadvantage to this form of learning. These factors are extremely important to a child’s intellectual development, which emphasizes the necessity of school environments. Furthermore, knowledge and skills are not the only things to expect from formal education but social relationships and mental development. Children who go to school and establish friendships can both have fun and improve their learning outcomes.

In conclusion, the Internet is a good way for young children to study at home, but I think that claiming schools are irrelevant to children’s learning because of this is merely absurd.

Sample 6:

Schooling is an important age for every juvenile in their life to decide a future career. There is speculation running on the need for schools in this contemporary world when it is possible for a pupil to search for any kind of knowledge over the Internet. I completely disagree with this notion as it leads to a lot of negative impact on kids’ psychological behaviour. In this essay. I will provide the necessary examples to back up my opinion.

On the one hand, schools are the best places to learn discipline and the culture of a student in his career. To be precise, a student who joins a school at an early age will be able to understand the importance of time management, build a relationship with other peers and an obedient nature towards elders. Furthermore, it teaches the importance of social life and networking with other friends. For instance, the intelligence quotient developed in children who attend school is much higher when compared to the juvenile who is using the internet as his source of information. Moreover, current schooling practices are also focusing more on extracurricular activities over academic progress to bring in creative thinking across children.

On the other hand, the internet can provide greater material about any aspect of the universe. However, the ability to mingle with other people to share the acquired information is limited if they don't attend classes. Moreover, the continuous home environment will increase claustrophobia in children which leads to greater health issues. For example, the recent pandemic situation has proven that children cannot continue their online studies for life long. Consequently, online learning has increased screentime instead of learning important content.

To conclude, I understand that the internet can provide substantial material for kids to learn any academic subject, but schools will provide many more additional capabilities that need to succeed in their career. Thus, I completely agree that classes are mandatory for each and every student to prosper and generate out of box thinking.

Sample 7:

It is sometimes argued that online learning will eventually eradicate the existence of schools as children can study well using the Internet. I largely disagree with this idea given the fact that only physical classes can provide qualified educators as well as effectively foster their social skills even though the internet can be a rich source of knowledge.

The foremost rationale for my disagreement with the eradication of schools is the importance of educational professionals. These specialized employees at schools are those who cannot only help children build up a solid knowledge base but also fill them with a sense of curiosity thanks to years of academic training and experience in teaching. By contrast, parents are generally short of both experience and expertise to deliver appropriate guidance even if they are given instructions from the internet.

Another argument for why I support schools is that these educational institutions provide an ideal environment for children’s interpersonal skills to establish and flourish. It is because young students are given the opportunities to interact with their peers, teachers as well as school staff in diverse projects or situations, which nurture their communication, teamwork, or problem-solving capability. However, these valuable opportunities are not available if they solely study in front of a computer or tablet monitor.

Nevertheless, I concede that the internet is currently an abundant source of learning materials. The educational content in various forms encompassing teaching videos, interactive textbooks or visually appealing infographics can make the pursuit of knowledge of young learners more intriguing. In comparison, traditional classroom learning typically involves reading from tedious printed textbooks and one-way dialogues from teachers to students.

In conclusion, I am mostly against the possibility of schools being replaced by homeschooling online as they possess well-trained and experienced teachers as well as continue to be the place where children can learn important soft skills. However, I also acknowledge that learning from the internet with more diverse materials is potentially an interesting experience. That is why governments should provide financial assistance for schools to incorporate modern teaching methods, including both online and offline learning to ensure the highest standard of children’s education.

Sample 8:

In this technological world, each and every one finds alternative ways in order to ease their life problems. Therefore, some argue that education centres are unimportant because pupils can learn and search for most information on the internet. Therefore, they do not need to go to school; they can study at home. I am afraid I have to disagree with the given notion and will elaborate on my viewpoint further.

To commence with, there are myriad reasons for my disagreement. First and foremost, they cannot gain experience, only study information. In other words, in schools, they can learn many other activities rather than education, such as many arts, singing, and dancing activities. Not only this, but they can also learn many important life lessons and manners along with discipline, which we cannot learn through the internet. Another reason is that at the house there is no strictness. They may misuse the internet. In-depth, they can access many other things on the internet, such as video games or movies which are not appropriate.

Furthermore, at learning home, we need to test the educational level of children. For example, there is no management like exams at home because they can easily access answers on the internet. Another important reason for my point is that not everyone can access the internet easily. For example, in a country like India, there is no free internet, as well as technical gadgets are also costly; consequently, poor people can not learn through the internet quickly.

However, some people believe that school is unnecessary because the first and foremost reason is that it brings the safety of children. Because there are many cases where the kidnapping of children happens. For example, in a country like Africa, four students were kidnapped while going to school; therefore, homeschooling is better in such cases. Another thing is that at home, children can learn in their own time, whether day or night, and they can access information at any time, anywhere on the internet. Nonetheless, from my point of view, the explanation I mentioned earlier is acceptable.

To conclude, by managing strong safety for children, we can overcome this problem. However, education for a student, like discipline, manners and other activities, is more important, so the internet cannot replace schools.

Sample 9:

There is no need to attend school as children can have almost all the information online; therefore, they can acquire knowledge at home. However, I am afraid I have to disagree with the earlier statement because I believe schools play a pivotal role in developing children’s character. In school, they not only get theoretical knowledge but learn other important lessons, which I will describe in the upcoming paragraphs.

In the 21st century, technological advancements made it possible to learn anything from residents with the help of the Internet. Moreover, everyone who can afford education has internet access. Hence, many believe children should study from home. This way, they can save many resources such as fuel and time as studying from home will omit to commute, so no fuel is used, and the time spent in commute can be used for something else such as spending more time with family members or learning something new. For instance, children who stay in the suburbs must spend more than an hour to reach school in the city.

Furthermore, not attending physical school can have many other advantages. Firstly, students can skip fixing timetables and can have flexibility. They can give more time to the subject in which they are weak. Secondly, the stress they feel in school because of competition with peers or related to attendance will not be there if they study from home by themself. Learning from the house will also provide them with the benefit of having freshly prepared breakfast and lunch, which is not possible if they attend a physical school because they have to eat packed lunches. Hence, many prefer to study from home.

Although I am completely against the concept of homeschooling for children, I believe that schools teach students many essential lessons that help shape them into better individuals. The most crucial thing which they learn from school is discipline. In life, discipline is the first key if anyone wants to succeed. Children will not understand the importance of making and following the g timetable in the home environment. Moreover, in school, they can meet new individuals and make friends. Through this, they learn the importance of helping and supporting each other, which will improve their academic skills. To cite an example, everyone’s expertise is different, and in school, a child with good maths can teach his friends maths, and he can learn drawing from his mates. This makes studying more fun. Hence, I emphasize the importance of sending children to school.

To conclude, nowadays, one can learn anything from the premises at home because of the Internet, so that schools can become optional. Nevertheless, the knowledge and experience which can be acquired from attending physical school will always retain the importance of attending the school. Therefore, schools should be mandatory.

Sample 10:

It has recently been argued that schools no longer play an indispensable educational role as children can conduct successful Internet-based self-study in the home. Truth be told, I find this view unconvinving.

On the face of it, children today can certainly receive a great amount of information on the Internet whenever they wish to learn new things at home. Since the advent of the World Wide Web, it has undeniably been easy for everyone, kids included, to undergo eye-opening experiences when they get online. Never in human history has there been such great access to so much information just with a click of the mouse.

However, it does not mean that all children using the Internet are able to teach themselves efficiently without schoolteachers. Arguably, the vast majority of kids are actually in need of professional guidance from educators in how to select quality sources of information from the ocean of websites and how to get the best out of them. More seriously, at a young age, most children are likely to be distracted from healthy learning activities by a wide variety of unhealthy online games, not to mention the harmful effects of adult materials in the virtual world that suddenly pop up on the computer screen while children are using the Internet. Therefore, it could be said that children's Internet use is one thing but learning effectively from its information sources is another.

In conclusion, despite children's Internet access in today's context, I hold the belief that schools still are, and will forever be, of the utmost importance in bringing academic success to children.

Sample 11:

With the advent of the Internet, students these days can easily access a large volume of information on any given subject. This current trend has given rise to a controversial issue that educational institutions have become obsolete and that children can learn from home. From my perspective, I strongly disagree with this statement for the following reasons.

To start with, the overwhelming variety of learning resources would potentially be counterproductive without the instruction of a mentor. Home computers and Internet access are undeniably integral for students to look up information for research. Equally important, though, is the provision of guidance from teachers and parental supervision in making effective use of the world wide web. Lack of proper guidance could lead students to misleading and unreliable materials. Whereas, in a structured learning environment, course books are thoroughly designed by prominent and qualified authors, providing learners with suitable knowledge in a systematic way.

On the other hand, upon the growing dominance of social networks such as Facebook, it seems that the Internet now offers even more distraction and unpleasantness than it has ever been. Thus, learners will likely succumb to the lure of chatting online instead of staying focused on their work. Besides, homeschooling will further entrench a worrying phenomenon that people these days would rather interact with electronic gadgets than engage in real human conversation. Therefore, the physical presence of a child in school or any other institution is of great importance, encouraging face-to-face communication and the development of interpersonal skills.

In conclusion, the Internet, despite being the most significant breakthrough in history, is indeed a mixed blessing. Learners can only harness their power to the full under the orientation and instruction of highly qualified schoolteachers. Only in that way can the Internet serve as a valuable aid/ a complement to the national curriculum.

Sample 12:

Owing to the abundance of information accessible on the internet, many are of the belief that children can effectively learn at home, making schools obsolete in today’s society. I completely disagree with this contention, and this essay will elaborate on my reasons.

Granted, one might argue that schools have become a thing of the past due to the appearance of the internet. The key rationale here is that this technology enables students to access a wide range of resources, namely online textbooks and educational websites. This wealth of information, therefore, can help these children deepen their understanding of subjects and explore topics beyond what is covered in the classroom. Nevertheless, the lax verification processes of many websites and online platforms could expose students to unreliable and misleading information, potentially taking a toll on their academic results and, by extension, their overall knowledge. This renders the role of teachers and schools warranted, as they are capable of ensuring the reliability and accuracy of the knowledge imparted to their students.

Moreover, schools play a dual role, not just as places for imparting academic knowledge but also as miniature societies where children can develop and refine their interpersonal abilities. This is because young students can develop their communication skills in various social settings through their daily interactions with peers and teachers in the school environment. For example, during group projects or classroom discussions, students have the opportunity to express their thoughts, actively listen to others, and engage in constructive dialogue. These interactions allow them to learn how to effectively communicate their ideas, understand different perspectives, and collaborate with others. Such experiences in school provide a practical foundation for children to develop strong interpersonal skills that will benefit them in future personal and professional relationships.

In conclusion, despite the usefulness of the internet regarding information accessibility, I am convinced that young students should continue going to school, given the accurate knowledge and social environment that these places offer.

Sample 13:

In the digital age, some people believe that the vast amount of information accessible via the Internet has rendered traditional schools inessential. This essay contends that, despite the value of the Internet for children’s learning, schools remain indispensable as they provide a structured academic environment and foster children’s holistic development.

It is true that the informational resources found on the Internet can serve to bolster children’s learning. Children with an Internet-connected device can log onto educational platforms and utilize various digital tools that can greatly enhance their learning experience. By visiting websites such as Khan Academy, for example, children can watch educational videos and take interactive lessons on virtually any subject. Such accessibility promotes self-directed learning, enabling students to explore their interests and pursue personalized educational paths. However, the major limitations of the Internet, particularly its lack of structure and its impersonal nature, make it ill-suited to replace traditional schooling, especially where children are concerned.

Therefore, I hold the belief that formal schools remain irreplaceable because of their unique advantages over online learning. One primary function of formal academic institutions is to provide a systematic approach to learning supported by not only guidance from trained educators but also additional monitoring from academic staff, which many online courses still lack. Another pivotal role of schools is in fostering socialization and the development of interpersonal skills. In a school setting, students learn to collaborate, communicate, and negotiate with their peers by engaging in extracurricular activities or participating in group projects. Such experiences cannot be adequately replicated in a virtual learning environment, yet they are vital for strengthening children’s social skills, increasing their empathy, and improving their emotional intelligence, all of which contribute to their well-rounded development.

In conclusion, while the internet has undoubtedly revolutionized access to information, traditional schools provide a holistic education that extends beyond knowledge acquisition to encompass children’s personal growth in emotional and social terms. Thus, these institutions remain a vital nexus of education and development for children in the modern world.

Sample 14:

The rapid advancement of the Internet has facilitated homeschooling as it offers a wealth of widely accessible information related to various subjects. However, I contend that schools are still necessary since they offer more organized learning environments for students compared to the Internet.

Admittedly, learning from the Internet offers students valuable information on essential subjects. To cite an example, one of the most popular educational websites, Khan Academy, offers a multitude of comprehensive video lessons that cover nearly every mandatory subject in school, namely mathematics, science and English among others. These lessons can be found on their website, as well as on YouTube free of charge. As a result, many children have the capacity to visit Khan Academy to study entirely from home due to its thorough yet easily accessible method of teaching. Based on this, it is justifiable why some may favor learning online at home.

However, schools are still the indispensable foundation for education since they impart more structured teaching in the form of curricula. Schools offer a standardized curriculum that provides preorganized lessons devised by pedagogical experts who understand what children need to learn for their comprehensive intellectual and social development. For ...