Sample 1:

Many individuals today would rather seek out medical advice themselves instead of seeing a licensed professional. In my opinion, this is a result of online convenience, and it is a positive development on the whole.

The main cause of this transition is the proliferation of information available on the internet. In the past, an ailing individual had little recourse other than to visit a doctor for tests. Now, there are a variety of question-and-answer websites as well as diagnosis ones that are free of cost and faster than a trip to a hospital. The slight conveniences of saving some money, time, and effort may not seem decisive, but mass behaviour is often driven by marginal advantages. For instance, posting a question to a forum such as Reddit.com where qualified professions may provide free advice is a powerful incentive to avoid a costly and time-consuming consultation with an experienced doctor.

Though there are risks associated with misdiagnosis, seeking advice online is generally more reliable. Doctors vary in their quality and numerous studies in recent years support the counter-intuitive conclusion that websites actually provide more trustworthy advice. This is a result of the accumulation of many years’ worth of data and the standardizing of detection, prognosis, and treatment. For example, the website WebMD.com allows users to search for their symptoms online, discover a range of possible causes and then decide themselves on the best path forward. This may include a visit to a hospital if further tests are required that can only be conducted in person, but at least the patient has saved time and money at the initial stage of diagnosis.

In conclusion, fewer people today visit doctors because there are cheap, convenient alternatives online and this is largely positive. There are risks that must be guarded against, but this change cannot be reversed.

Sample 2:

Due to cutting-edge technology, now everything is available on the internet. Even learning to earn, the internet is playing an indispensable role. So, it is argued that people tend to ask about their medical problems like diabetes, hypertension; but they are reluctant to visit doctors. I think it is a negative development for their physical and mental growth.

At the outset, people prefer to take advice on medical ailments instead of visiting doctors due to technology expansion. They search on the internet about the causes and treatment of the ailment and cure their illness. Besides, they get afraid to give the hefty amount to doctors that the practitioners take from the patients, and it is a herculean task for the people to pay heavily. So, they think to treat any disease at home. For instance, due to COVID-19, many masses think to treat themselves at home by following some YouTube channels as well as asking queries about their ailments, and they find a viable solution. Otherwise, getting themselves treated in a hospital is beyond their pocket.

To my mind, it is a negative development as people visit doctors when they are on their last legs, and it becomes a difficult task for physicians to save the life of a patient who is on his last bed. So, people put their lives in danger by not visiting doctors when they have a real need.

Apart from it, the fear of being robbed by the doctors makes them mentally and physically unfit, and they put off their meeting with doctors and make their situation worse. Thus, unfounded belief is a great hindrance in reaching hospitals at the right time.

In conclusion, thus technology, as well as people’s attitude towards hospitals and practitioners, make them taking advice and avoiding to visit doctors. This attitude is unhealthy for them as they put themselves in peril and pay an enormous amount to get treated well in a hospital in the end.

Sample 3:

These days, some people would rather consult online resources or other people for medical advice than visit hospitals. This essay will explain why this is taking place and how it would be harmful for society.

There are a number of causes for this circumstance. To begin with, one of the most important factors is that consumers pay more for medical expenses and greater consultation fees than other institutions. This burns a hole in their pockets. Second, the most frequent problems include a small number of people following other people’s advice for simpler causes like fever, headaches, and coughs. For instance, young people in the current generation are choosing online treatment for the aforementioned problems due to the greater costs in hospitals. Therefore, the general public believes that this kind of medication is straightforward and economical.

In my opinion, choosing medications based on the preferences of some persons may have more negative effects. Doctors are trained to treat the general population based on their symptoms and to provide medications in line with those symptoms. Because individuals have no knowledge of the tablets, injections, and ointments that are effective for treating the illness, it will have an effect on the health sector if they choose to use their own medication. For instance, some injections and pills have high medication concentrations that, if taken by individuals without a doctor’s prescription, could result in infections or even death. So, it would not be a smart idea to continue this behaviour. Therefore, it would have a bad impact on the general public and the community.

To conclude, the reasons why people should select their own medications were discussed above. However, this is a bad habit as it could result in both bodily and mental instability.

Sample 4:

In today's digital era, the inclination towards seeking medical counsel online rather than visiting a healthcare professional in person has become increasingly prevalent. This phenomenon can be attributed to several factors, including the convenience and immediacy the Internet offers. However, the implications of this trend warrant a nuanced examination.

The primary allure of online medical advice lies in its accessibility and speed. In Vietnam, where urban and rural disparities in healthcare access are pronounced, the Internet serves as a bridge, providing immediate information to those who might otherwise delay or forego consultation due to geographical or financial constraints. For instance, a resident in a remote Vietnamese village can learn about symptoms and potential treatments without the need to travel extensive distances. This scenario exemplifies the passive voice usage by highlighting the services received by the individual from the Internet. Yet, relying solely on such advice can lead to misdiagnoses. If everyone had access to reliable healthcare services, the necessity for online medical advice might diminish, illustrating a type 2 conditional sentence.

However, I believe that this shift towards digital consultation harbors more negative consequences. The accuracy of online medical information can be dubious, lacking the personalized diagnosis a face-to-face consultation can provide. Personalized care, after all, considers the patient's full medical history and conducts necessary physical examinations, elements often overlooked online. Moreover, the potential for self-diagnosis to lead to anxiety or incorrect treatment is significant. In Vietnam, a trend towards self-medication based on online advice has been observed, potentially exacerbating health issues rather than alleviating them.

In conclusion, while the Internet undoubtedly offers invaluable resources for educating the public on health-related matters, its role as a primary source of medical advice is fraught with risks. The convenience of digital information should not supersede the irreplaceable value of professional medical assessment. As such, this development, though born from the modern convenience and necessity of our times, leans more towards a negative trajectory in the realm of healthcare.