Bài tập  /  Bài đang cần trả lời

Write a 250-word essay about the topic below: Do you worry about the lack of anonymity in the Digital Age?

Write a 250-word essay about the topic below: Do you worry about the lack of anonymity in the Digital Age?
 
4 trả lời
Hỏi chi tiết
152
Tham khảo câu trả lời từ Trợ lý ảo Lazi
In the Digital Age, where our lives are increasingly intertwined with technology, the lack of anonymity has become a growing concern for many individuals. With every click, search, and transaction, our personal information is being collected, stored, and analyzed by various entities. This lack of privacy raises valid concerns about the potential misuse and abuse of our personal data.

One of the main reasons why people worry about the lack of anonymity is the potential for identity theft and fraud. As our personal information is stored online, it becomes vulnerable to hackers and cybercriminals who can use it for malicious purposes. This can lead to financial loss, damage to our reputation, and even emotional distress. The fear of falling victim to such crimes is a legitimate concern in the Digital Age.

Furthermore, the lack of anonymity can also have a chilling effect on our freedom of expression. In an era where social media platforms dominate our communication, people may feel hesitant to express their true opinions and beliefs for fear of backlash or judgment. This self-censorship can hinder open dialogue and the exchange of ideas, ultimately stifling intellectual growth and progress.

Moreover, the lack of anonymity can also lead to targeted advertising and invasion of privacy. Companies and advertisers track our online activities to tailor advertisements specifically to our interests and preferences. While some may argue that personalized ads can enhance our online experience, others feel that it is an intrusion into their personal lives. The constant bombardment of targeted ads can feel invasive and manipulative, eroding our sense of autonomy and control.

In conclusion, the lack of anonymity in the Digital Age is a legitimate concern that warrants attention. It poses risks to our personal security, freedom of expression, and privacy. As technology continues to advance, it is crucial for individuals, governments, and corporations to prioritize the protection of personal data and ensure that individuals have control over their online identities. Only by addressing these concerns can we fully embrace the benefits of the Digital Age while safeguarding our fundamental rights and values.
0
0
hieu lam
01/07/2023 17:41:29
+5đ tặng

Only a hermit could be termed as a totally private person and even then they are not necessarily anonymous. in fact they may be a famous hermit!

The question should be not whether we are concerned about anonymity but whether we are concerned about the level of control we have over our anonymity. CONTROL is the key term. I believe at the heart of questions like this one is a concern over a loss of control of who we are - which is defined by the perceptions of those around us, which we directly or indirectly seek to influence with every word and action we take. In the internet we seem to have a black or white, all or nothing level of control on our privacy and thus anonymity. We cede control of who we are to large corporates like Facebook and Google and we have to TRUST them to share who we are in a way that we are happy with.

Trouble is - they only have one role in life - make money for their investors and the oil of their business is the data about us. Its this connection between our data and their business model that undermines anonymity - because these corporates decide how and when to share your data - and they hide behind opaque privacy policies that enable them maximum degrees of freedom on how to monetize who we are - and the very act of monetization continuously erodes things like anonymity.

This is why I am forming a new social network based on a new business model that fundamentally disrupts the accepted approach of today.

If we want a user to truly trust the internet service provider (in our case a social network) then we have to

1. Cede CONTROL of the data to the user of the service

2. Be utterly and verifiably transparent about how the data is used

3. Empower the user with RECOURSE tools over their data - such as the unalienable right to delete even data that has been shared.

We have built this social network and are currently finalising our legal structures to enable all 3 of the above - if you know of a VC or substantive angel - let them know we are starting our run for investment now.

Mở khóa để xem toàn bộ nội dung trả lời

(?)
Bạn đã đạt đến giới hạn của mình. Bằng cách Đăng ký tài khoản, bạn có thể xem toàn bộ nội dung trả lời
Cải thiện điểm số của bạn bằng cách đăng ký tài khoản Lazi.
Xem toàn bộ các câu trả lời, chat trực tiếp 1:1 với đội ngũ Gia sư Lazi bằng cách Đăng nhập tài khoản ngay bây giờ
Tôi đã có tài khoản? Đăng nhập
1
1
Công Nhân
01/07/2023 17:43:07
+4đ tặng
A rather late response to an article I enjoyed, but it took a long time for me to find this second follow-up.
I have multiple online “identities” or usernames, and only a minority of them provide knowledge of something people already don’t know. Were those published, I would be, perhaps, isolated by my peers. I do not fear publication, however, because I think that I am not going to become a global phenomenon. No one cares about one of two billion internet users unless there’s something special about them. There’s nothing special about me, so I am not going to be tracked.
I personally like that no one cares about me. I like my anonymity, although I am fully aware of how far it expands.
As for tech tools, I do use them occasionally to look people up, and I have become friends on facebook with the actual person behind the user for a few people I’ve met on forums, blogs, etc. I never actually interact with them, however, preferring myself to see them only as that online user and not as someone in real life. Could I let the world know who they are? Yes. Could they do the same to me? Yes. Will I? No. Do I think they will? No. There is honor among internet users.
Công Nhân
Cham diem giup minh nha ban
1
1
Nguyen Mai Anh
01/07/2023 17:43:23
+3đ tặng

Talking about online anonymity is like trying to see the world as either black or white, with no shades of grey.

Only a hermit could be termed as a totally private person and even then they are not necessarily anonymous. in fact they may be a famous hermit!

The question should be not whether we are concerned about anonymity but whether we are concerned about the level of control we have over our anonymity. CONTROL is the key term. I believe at the heart of questions like this one is a concern over a loss of control of who we are - which is defined by the perceptions of those around us, which we directly or indirectly seek to influence with every word and action we take. In the internet we seem to have a black or white, all or nothing level of control on our privacy and thus anonymity. We cede control of who we are to large corporates like Facebook and Google and we have to TRUST them to share who we are in a way that we are happy with.

Trouble is - they only have one role in life - make money for their investors and the oil of their business is the data about us. Its this connection between our data and their business model that undermines anonymity - because these corporates decide how and when to share your data - and they hide behind opaque privacy policies that enable them maximum degrees of freedom on how to monetize who we are - and the very act of monetization continuously erodes things like anonymity.

This is why I am forming a new social network based on a new business model that fundamentally disrupts the accepted approach of today.

0
0

Bạn hỏi - Lazi trả lời

Bạn muốn biết điều gì?

GỬI CÂU HỎI
Học tập không giới hạn cùng học sinh cả nước và AI, sôi động, tích cực, trải nghiệm

Hôm nay bạn thế nào? Hãy nhấp vào một lựa chọn, nếu may mắn bạn sẽ được tặng 50.000 xu từ Lazi

Vui Buồn Bình thường

Học ngoại ngữ với Flashcard

×
Gia sư Lazi Gia sư
×
Trợ lý ảo Trợ lý ảo