Sample 1:

Many organizations have chosen open office space areas instead of divided offices. In my view, although there are some minor drawbacks, having such an office layout proves to be more advantageous.

On the one hand, having no walls to separate employees can be problematic. Firstly, having no separate rooms means that all interactions between employees take place in one location, which generates a high level of noise. This constant background noise may be seen as a source of distraction, disabling employees to focus on their work. Secondly, there is no privacy in such layouts. All conversations are likely to be overheard, and all actions are likely to be observed. Employees might feel that they are always being supervised, which may result in lower job satisfaction amongst some of them.

On the other hand, an open space layout is much more beneficial for the company. To begin with, the absence of physical barriers allows all employees to interact more frequently with each other, which facilitates internal communication within the organization. This helps to establish a harmonious workplace, creating mutual understanding among employees, thereby improving their work efficiency. Furthermore, compared to a more traditional workplace, an open-plan office is a far more cost-effective choice. Costs are reduced on construction as there is no need to build walls or cubicles. It is also much cheaper in terms of office equipment since communal space allows shared use of equipment such as printers or projectors.

In conclusion, working in an open space office might be uncomfortable for some employees as there can be excessive noise and a lack of privacy. However, I think that the benefits that it brings for the company, such as helping the company save money and improve employee productivity, are more significant.

Sample 2:

Many offices these days are opting for open designs over more traditional, compartmentalized floor plans. In my opinion, despite the limited advantages for efficiency, this is a positive change due to its social and work-related benefits.

On the one hand, an open layout can reduce efficiency. When individuals work in private offices or cubicles, they are less likely to be disturbed and can therefore work more effectively. Each time a person is interrupted, this not only requires them to stop working but it may also take an indeterminate amount of time to focus again. Over the course of a day, various interruptions in the aggregate can massively reduce the amount of work completed. Recent research has in fact shown that communication around the office, though beneficial in other ways, does lead to declines in total work output. An office trying to achieve optimal output thus should emphasize private working spaces.

On the other hand, increased communication is a boon both socially and creatively. A standout example of this would be the offices designed by Apple founder Steve Jobs for both Pixar and Apple. He intentionally created offices that directed individuals to meet in common areas and that would facilitate interactions between different divisions in the company. The impact of this on morale is massive as individuals can make friends and enjoy each other’s company throughout the workday. Moreover, the true intention of this design was to facilitate creativity. By meeting others on a regular basis, employees are more likely to combine diverse perspectives and be more imaginative in their work.

In conclusion, although there may be minor tradeoffs in terms of productivity, this is a progressive change as it allows employees to converse and be more creative. Such offices should become the rule, rather than the exception.

Sample 3:

Nowadays, many companies are opting for open workspaces instead of separate rooms for work. In my opinion, the advantages of choosing an open working environment far outweigh any potential drawbacks.

On the one hand, there are certain disadvantages to implementing open designs for both individuals and the company as a whole. One of the main drawbacks is the lack of privacy and personal space for employees, as there are no physical partitions separating them. This can lead to increased stress levels and may result in employees feeling pressured to work harder and longer hours. Additionally, an open workspace can make it challenging for the company to foster a sense of belonging among its employees, which is an important factor in promoting collaboration and productivity. Without this sense of belonging, employees may be more likely to consider leaving the company, which could negatively impact overall performance.

On the other hand, there are several advantages to adopting open workspaces in offices. Firstly, it can help companies save on their budgets. Open designs often include additional facilities such as cafeterias and meeting rooms, providing employees with convenient spaces to socialize or conduct business activities. Secondly, with responsible managers and administrators, the workspace can be kept clean and organized at all times. This contributes to a more pleasant and productive work environment. Lastly, the well-being of the workforce can be automatically improved by providing access to these facilities and services, without requiring additional strategies or financial investments from the company.

In conclusion, while open-space designs may have certain disadvantages, the benefits they bring far outweigh these drawbacks. By creating a cost-effective and enjoyable work environment, companies can enhance productivity and overall employee satisfaction.

Sample 4:

That in recent years, open-space offices are replacing working areas with separate rooms has become a hot topic of debate. In my opinion, the positives of this trend overshadow the negatives.

On the one hand, open spaces have two drawbacks, which are an increased level of distraction and risks to employee’s health. First, working in a communal space easily drives one to distraction. From noises of phone calls to colleagues conversing, an employee faces loads of disturbances that can cost them their work efficiency. What is more, a communal office space is an ideal environment for diseases to spread. Take the “3 green” model that was employed by various factories during the height of Covid-19 in Vietnam for example, due to the employees living in close proximity, Covid-19 spreaded easily and the model had to be deployed soon.

Despite the disadvantages, I believe the advantages of open-plan offices are more considerable. First, an open-space office can facilitate communication and foster friendships between employees. An open space allows employees to communicate with one another more freely and timely. This leads to ideas flowing more effortlessly and innovations to be born more quickly. Furthermore, by working together and having more chances to get to know each other, employees can form stronger bonds, thus boosting the company’s culture. Moreover, open-space offices help save cost on amenities such as printers, scanners, and lockers. Whereas separate offices require a multitude of these equipment, employees who work in an open-plan office can share these utilities.

In conclusion, I believe that the advantages of open-plan offices eclipse its drawbacks. Due to its ability to help the company cut costs and facilitate interaction and innovation, open-space offices are the future of working space.

Sample 5:

These days, many offices choose open floor plans to more traditional, compartmentalized layouts. Despite the low efficiency improvements, this is a positive change in my perspective because of the social and workplace benefits which would be analysed objectively during the course of the essay.

An open layout, on the one hand, can diminish efficiency. Individuals who work in private offices or cubicles are less likely to be bothered, which allows them to work more efficiently. Each time a person is stopped, they must not only stop working, but it may also take an indefinite length of time for them to regain attention. Various interruptions can significantly diminish the amount of work performed over the course of a day. According to recent studies, while office communication is useful in other ways, it does result in a decrease in total work output. As a result, an office attempting to maximize output should place a premium on private working areas.

On the other hand, increased communication is a social and creative blessing. The offices of many pioneers in technological firms or social media platforms are a good example of this. They design offices so that people can meet in common spaces and so that interactions between different departments of the organization are easier. Individuals can establish friends and enjoy each other’s company during the workday, which has a huge impact on morale. Furthermore, the primary goal of this design is to encourage innovation. Employees are more likely to blend multiple ideas and be more inventive in their job if they meet with others on a frequent basis.

To summarize, while there may be minor productivity costs, this is a positive shift because it allows people to converse and be more creative. From my own perspective, instead of being the exception, such offices should become the norm.

Sample 6:

Many modern offices are now adopting open spaces in lieu of separate working areas for employees. While some would say that such a setting can heighten the level of distraction as well as pose risks to employees’ health, I contend that the fostering of closer collaboration among colleagues and reducing costs outweigh the disadvantages.

Open-space offices can result in more distractions which consequently affect productivity and health. Owing to a lack of private space, employees often have to contend with distractions, such as nearby conversations and co-workers congregating. These diversions may cause them to lose focus and engagement in their work. Furthermore, employees can potentially suffer from poorer health in an open-space office. As they are situated closer together, it gives various pathogens ample opportunity to spread and maximise the potential rate of infection. This can lead to increased absences from work, which in turn may negatively affect overall productivity.

However, open-space offices engender better social relations and cost less. Having an open office can reduce construction and utility expenses as well as the need for office equipment. All employees can share equipment and resources such as printers and stationery. Open-space offices can also engender closer communication and teamwork between workers. Such an environment makes it easier for them to exchange ideas and fosters greater inclusion. Since most businesses thrive on innovation, having all employees in a single space can help those ideas to flow faster and get everyone involved in the process.

In conclusion, despite the disadvantages related to loss of concentration and adverse risks to health, I would assert these are outweighed by how such a setup can stimulate closer collaboration between employees and reduce costs. In the near future, it is likely offices with separate rooms will completely be phased out in favour of open offices.