Sample 1:

Some are of the belief that any prospective reforms to combat climate change will necessarily be injurious to businesses. In my opinion, despite the marginal market for eco-friendly companies, this is largely true.

Environmentalists often argue that green businesses can be profitable. There are numerous examples from all over the world of corporations excelling in fields such as eco-friendly foods, cars, energy and fashion. For instance, Tesla has become one of the largest automobile manufacturers over the last decade with a unique focus on stylish electronic cars. Their success is by far the greatest so far in the emerging sector of green energy consumer products and will doubtlessly inspire a generation of entrepreneurs to view protecting the environment as a potential catalyst for growth rather than a deterrent to profits.

However, the examples above are still dwarfed by most industries and governmental regulation will surely hurt large and small businesses. In the past, well-intentioned environmental policy has failed to take into account the far-reaching impact of even the simplest stipulations. For example, when nations band together to sign treaties such as the recent Paris Accords, nearly all countries eventually fail to live up to the standards laid out because of the economic downsides and how that could affect their popularity domestically. As soon as one nation begins to fall short of their commitment, other countries have no choice but to also prioritise corporations over the environment for fear of losing power in later elections.

In conclusion, though there is some potential in green business models, they will always have dire economic repercussions. This does not make them less justified, but it is an important consideration to temper expectations of progress.

Sample 2:

In the contemporary debate regarding climate change reforms, opinions are sharply divided. While some argue that these reforms could hinder business operations, others view them as a springboard for innovation and growth in the corporate sector.

Critics of climate change reforms assert that such measures could impose significant financial burdens on businesses, especially in emerging markets like Vietnam. For instance, the adoption of green technologies and practices, though environmentally beneficial, requires substantial initial investments. This can be particularly challenging for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that operate with limited capital. Moreover, the transition to eco-friendly operations may necessitate a complete overhaul of existing processes, leading to increased costs and potential disruptions in productivity. However, this viewpoint can be counterbalanced by the fact that, in the long run, sustainable practices often lead to cost savings and increased efficiency.

However, I believe that embracing climate change reforms offers a valuable opportunity for businesses. These reforms can serve as a catalyst for innovation, opening up new markets and creating demand for green products and services. For example, in Vietnam, there is a growing consumer preference for sustainable and environmentally friendly products. This shift in consumer behavior presents a lucrative opportunity for businesses to differentiate themselves in the market. Furthermore, companies that proactively adopt green practices may benefit from government incentives and enhanced brand reputation, which can lead to increased customer loyalty and market share.

In conclusion, while it is undeniable that climate change reforms present certain challenges to businesses, particularly in the short term, they also offer substantial opportunities for growth and innovation. Embracing these reforms not only contributes to the global fight against climate change but also aligns with the evolving preferences of the consumer market, particularly in Vietnam. It is my opinion that the potential benefits of these reforms far outweigh the initial challenges they may pose.

Sample 3:

In the wake of the climate crisis rearing its ugly head over the last decade, there has been a growing call globally for climate change mitigation. People are divided over whether measures implemented for this will have a negative impact on private concerns or will be a chance for the companies to grow.

Deliberating over the possible ramifications first, it is obvious that since climate change initiatives involve a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, businesses, especially manufacturing units, will take a hit as they try to meet the reduced emission standards. As governments across the globe, working on combatting climate change, have adopted net-zero carbon targets, the rules that will be implemented will render many products from petrol and diesel cars to single-use plastic straws and bottles obsolete.

However, the opportunities that have opened up as a result of climate change reforms are tremendous which many companies have already seized. One example is the surge in interest in electric vehicles in the light of needing to meet the strict emission guidelines to battle climate change, an opportunity which many tech giants such as Tesla have already taken advantage of. Moreover, embracing eco-friendly technology and clean energy, such as solar energy, can not only reduce the carbon footprint of businesses but also bring down the running costs of businesses in the long run. Another possibility of advancement for companies comes from the groundswell of support by the general public favouring eco-friendly products, thereby making going green the next big opportunity.

Finally, I believe that although the measures to ameliorate climate change may have short-term adverse impacts, in the long run, they will present many golden opportunities for companies--small firms or big conglomerates. After all, innovating and walking the untrodden path can lead to new market opportunities.

Sample 4:

As the effects of climate change are getting more significant, many think businesses will collapse, while others predict that they will flourish. I believe that whether a business would do well depends on its target market.

It is undeniable that many businesses will face challenges as climate change proceeds. Firstly, those that involve or exploit natural resources will be the first to face the consequences of climate change. For example, the entire agriculture industry will most definitely suffer from constant natural disasters, while mines and oil drills worldwide deal with resource depletion. Secondly, transportation businesses will be challenged with multiple hardships. Natural disasters, like earthquakes, flooding, or heavy storms, will cause various road blockages, delaying the transportation of both goods and people.

However, stating that all businesses will collapse is a pure exaggeration since many will flourish during these times. Firstly, those that promote sustainability can expand their market. This growth is because as climate change takes effect, humans will gradually have to change their consumption behaviors. These are businesses that sell products like reusable water bottles, portable wooden utensils packs, or biodegradable cosmetics. Secondly, I believe tech companies that research alternatives to fossil fuels will become the top players. For example, Tesla is now doing extremely well with its electric cars. In Vietnam, the VinGroup corporation can also collect more profits from its electric scooter products.

In conclusion, there is a collapse of major businesses when climate change hits. However, those that focus on promoting environmentally friendly products will experience significant growth.

Sample 5:

Climate change is the biggest concern for human beings, so governments are taking measures to contain it. It is said that many businesses will be harmed due to climate change reforms, while others find it as an opportunity. Although it may boost the renewal energy production business, some car companies can be closed. I also opine that climate change reforms may reduce sales of many types of goods.

Climate change reforms can lead to the cease of many automobile companies. A majority of cars and other vehicles use petrol or diesel to run. These fossil fuels emit greenhouse gases after burning. Vehicles are considered the second main reason for increasing the earth's temperature and climate change. So, governments around the world want to stop the production of vehicles that use petrol and diesel. If the state orders to completely close the production of petrol and diesel vehicles, as a climate change reform, it can lead to the shutting down of many auto manufacturing companies. This is because the transition from producing one type of vehicle to another is not easy and cheap. Therefore, many companies will not withstand this stringent measure.

However, the government measures to control climate change can stimulate renewable energy equipment businesses. To contain, the emission of greenhouse gases, the state is promoting solar energy, wind energy and other green energy solutions. The government also subsidise this equipment so that more and more people buy it. Due to this, the demand for solar panels, batteries, connecting wires, windmill parts and other materials is increasing. It boosted the sales of companies that produce renewable energy system parts. Thus, the green energy sector has boomed manyfold since the states started taking measures to control climate change.

Nonetheless, climate change reforms are detrimental to a majority of businesses. All companies produce goods and use transportation systems to reach their products everywhere in the country. But governments want to reduce the consumption of petrol and diesel so that greenhouse gases are contained. For that reason, petrol and diesel prices are being increased more frequently. The less fossil fuels are used, the less will be greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. However, increasing the prices of fuels causes an increase in transportation costs, increases the product price and ultimately reduces the sales of goods. It harms the company's profit. Thereby, businesses may face loss or closure.

To conclude, businesses that produce parts and equipment used to produce green energy get the benefits of the government's steps to control climate change as renewable energy sources are promoted by the state. But automobile sector and companies that need transportation to transport their products face loss as the state discourages the use of fossil fuels. It will shut car manufacturing companies and many other businesses. Therefore, climate change reforms will adversely affect the business.