1. Would you do the same if you were the man? Why?
This is a highly subjective question and the answer depends entirely on individual values and priorities.
Arguments for doing the same:
Self-preservation: The man's actions were driven by the instinct for survival. He recognized the immediate danger and took drastic measures to protect himself.
Distraction and Escape: His strategy, while risky, effectively distracted the sharks and allowed him to escape to shore.
Arguments against doing the same:
Cruelty: Deliberately injuring oneself is a desperate measure and could have had severe consequences, even if it saved his life.
Ethical Concerns: Some might argue that the man's actions were unethical, as he used the sharks' predatory nature against them.
Ultimately, the decision would depend on the individual's assessment of the situation, their risk tolerance, and their ethical stance.
2. Did the shark catch the man's leg and hurt it?
No. The passage states that the man cut his own leg to create a blood trail to lure the sharks away. He did not get bitten by the shark.
3. Who killed the shark?
The other sharks killed the injured shark. After the injured shark crashed against the rocks, the other sharks attacked and devoured it.